The Point

Reality is a generation of the point. This is process. There is only process. Substance is an abbreviation of thought; to stand as elemental constituents of a simplified, fathomable reality, while that reality is a more complex process than that, composed of complex sub-processes. As we attempt to describe aspects of reality with mathematics, reality itself is mathematical development, approaching, and consisting of, completion of itself.

This hypothesis is a framework consisting of the following hypotheses. The hypotheses are given with some overlapping repetition of features, as they interlock to form the overall framework.

Time

Time is the apparent production of dimensionality, while dimensionality is actually fully developed within the point. As part of that in there, consciousness is defined, in infinite variety, as an attribute of the dimensionality it experiences as quantized developments. We need not ask why and how there can be time, since the point is both nothing and everything.

The most fundamental form of time, relative to consciousness inferred within the point, is the infinite clock. With an infinite rate relative to consciousness, it cannot be detected as a clock, but is perceived as the basis of reality we regard as substance. The infinite clock rate is as unavoidable as the point is itself. Any rate or pattern of alternation for the existence/non-existence of the point will stand as the ultimate reference of the realities generated. Every aspect of those realities consists of an eternity, in that the point will have cycled an infinite number of times as it inferred each aspect.

The next most fundamental clock supporting consciousness is Vc, the "speed" of light. Vc is the timing relationships composing the apparent development of dimensionality with respect to the consciousness included in this active geometric definition of mathematical reality.

All systems are part of the time of reality, with respect to conscious systems. All systems are pre-defined within the overall definition of the point. From the conscious reference frame, time produces a partial record of a past, and indications for anticipation about a future. Consciousness can also recognize, and accept, that its reality is within the complete mathematical definition of development, as a structure of dimensionality, where time exists beside itself, as well as before and after. We observe this as an array of individual systems, and note our ability to produce semi-independent rates of time within any frame we choose to define with the relative association of motion.

Universal Systemology

The structure of mathematical reality, from the reference frame of consciousness, takes on a quantization of relative dimension frames that could be summed up by saying "atoms are made of very much smaller atoms, without limit to the compository sequence."

The reason the Universe is able to remember how to make each H continue to exist, as an essentially perfect duplicate of its siblings, is that the whole Universe is each one of them, for their time, as they compose any one that is the collection of all of them; as the whole system is a generation of infinite dimensionality by the infinitely fast point. Each one acts the biggest, and the littlest. The timing of the point infers the meaning that includes the consciousness that experiences the timing as a world of space and developmental relationships between systems.

Particle Logic

We have seen that particles can generate sets of lesser particles. If we try to impose a limit on this, we are left with a question of what it is that composes the substance of our smallest particle. Reality is filled with examples of substance having lesser components. What is the substance of a minimum static object? What are its "walls" made of? We would have to say that it is a magical source of minimum definition. It’s a magic marble. Its substance has no components. Its substance exists purely as relative phenomena. Its substance is relative logic. Its substance is its interaction with other units, just like itself. Its substance is temporal. It is an object consisting of a relationship in time, between other relationships in time. The minimum particle is the lowest energy photon relationship event. Even that, if it exists; if it is real; is a product of the Universe. It fits into the equation. It brings reality into balance. It completes the total definition of the point. It was an aspect of the point. If we observe it, it was an aspect that participated in conscious aspects.

Space-Time

Space is anti-time, and time is anti-space. The roles are reversed if you take the view that a photon is the Universe, and the Universe is a photon going the other way. This fundamental element of mathematical reality is a building block that generates worlds in parallel with anti-worlds, with respect to the consciousness included therein. For the most part, these worlds are fairly well "isolated," though they are forever inextricably woven together as a balance that makes each world possible for itself. When one side is fleetingly observed by the other, we can assume that the other is likewise observing its antecedent. From the complete reference frame, as a sum of reality, these worlds are within the point. From a divided frame of phase emphasis, where consciousness is defined, and observation is possible, these worlds are symmetrical aspects of the complete collection of all eternities. Consciousness is within space-time, while the greater total truth is within the point. From our reference frame, the photon can be regarded as a pivot between the world and the anti-world. There are no anti-photons.

Relative Dimensionality

Time is the structure of dimensionality, as viewed by the consciousness included in complete mathematical fact. Each dimension is fully defined by Vc. This first becomes notable when we consider the generation of the fourth dimension from its three dimensional components.

If a three dimensional object could be moved across a three dimensional frame at Vc, infinite energy would be consumed. All of the energy of the frame would be directed to be this one event. No other motion could exist, not even within the object. The totality of motions in the three dimensional frame defines the next dimension; just as a totality of two dimensional frames would "stack" to define a single three dimensional frame. Such a single frame would be void of motion, and void of time. Uniform motion is a reference we refer to as time. Any motion has instantaneous components of uniform motion. In reality, such complex motion is the only motion that exists. Objects moving through space are influenced by many forces. Though we often regard them as negligible, they are true components of reality. A clock has components of variation that average out to deliver uniform information, with respect to other such systems. It is not purely four dimensional. It is representative of four dimensions, as a cardboard box represents three, or a piece of paper represents two. All have internal and external energetic component relationships. Dimensionality is integrated as objects. Dimension components can only be separated in our imagination, as we analyze aspects of reality into simplifications that are only real as active thought processes.

Vc is the issuing of eternities between the definitions of relationships that compose reality, with respect to consciousness. These eternities appear finite, or even infinitely quick, to consciousness because consciousness is built out of them. It rides on them to observe a three dimensional world that changes with time to define a greater eternity. That eternity will be a component of yet greater eternities. The quantization of eternities is the inescapable mathematical nature of the point. Every viewpoint is defined by systematic relationships that are separated by Vc timing delays. The photon itself would say that all of its relationships are touching.

There are infinite dimensions. This is the mathematical structure of reality. Within this complete progression of the point, consciousness observes fundamental dimensions. Three of these define space for us, as the Vc timing delays between events that compose reality. The next three define time, time of time, and time of time of time; or time, energy, and energy patterns. In other words, if we consider time to be the fourth dimension, then we are designating energy as the fifth. We will note a parallel between this and our physics expressions.

The next three dimensions are observed as memory attributes of reality. Memory is the quality of repetition of time... the continuation of dimensional generation as additional factors of time upon time. Without memory attributes, change would be purely chaotic, and we would not observe systems such as big bangs, galaxies, solar systems, atoms, and biological creatures. It just takes that many more cycles of eternities of eternities for mathematics to define the kind of sensible world that can include the development of consciousness. Its future defined, consciousness proceeds on an apparent basis of time in developing order.

The first of these higher three dimensions we observe as memory, supports the definition that very well continues a sequence in reality we appreciate as uniform motion for time, with respect to consciousness. The next one likewise supports energetic relationship attributes. The Universe remembers where each subsystem belongs with respect to all the others, in the progression of developments, because it has enough time to do that. It is all the time that is that. The third one is system memory itself — that which can support consciousness of energy patterns by energy patterns, over time. At this point we have defined nine fundamental dimensions of time. While we surmise a reality of systems generated by an infinite clock, we intimately observe a reality of times defined by Vc relationships.

Particle behavior is characterized by the uncertainty principle. The source of our uncertainty is the infinite complexity of infinitely dimensional reality. Reality’s memory is not absolutely perfect, except through compensation and averaging. These "defects" are actually fundamental attributes of the mechanics that is gravitation to one frame, and charge to another. Our uncertainty is part of complete, perfectly balanced reality.

Three more dimensions would place consciousness within a complete collection of times of consciousness produced as developments within complete mathematics. The developmental trend that defines conscious systems, is leading toward this twelve dimensional definition, as a parallel-series of interacting twelve dimensional sub-systems. We could imagine this as a collection of hydrogen atoms that are acting to define a single very large hydrogen atom. The substance in this is time rather than stuff. Stuff is the meanings of times to times.

While we observe in nine dimensions, to anticipate the development of twelve, infinite dimensionality is a progression of interlocking relative quantizations of fundamental dimensionality. The source of our nine dimensional reality frame is an internal basis of sequentially interlocked twelve dimensional sub-frames, with no limit to the series; leading to the infinite clock. This same view must widen its horizons at the other end of size to acknowledge the continued inference of infinite dimensionality as all eternities of eternity.

This size-based viewpoint is interchangeable with a time-based view that sees a single twelve dimensional frame of time of times. The larger and smaller levels are other parts of overall time. Each part is a unique vantage point upon the whole. Each part is generated by the whole from within. Each part is some of the time of the whole, leading from the whole, to the whole.

Both viewpoints of relative dimensionality are the complex reality inferred by the point to the consciousness inferred along with them. Complete dimensionality is an infinite point. The system all adds up to a point that generates the system.

The General Frame

Time has four phases; positive and negative matter, and positive and negative anti-matter. Since time is not static to us, it is the transformation of itself through its phases, relative to conscious reference frames composed of such complex time. Thus, we see particles with cyclical wave properties. On the large scale we see a balanced process of the production of sources of time from an apparent big bang, and the draining of those same sources into a distribution of black holes; all of which defines the span of a phase of time. From a larger reference frame such a span would be observed as a quantum of charge-time, such as those within what we described as sources of time emerging from our big bang.

Gravitation is a relative view of the flow of time from one of its phases to another. It is a perfect complement to the expansion of the Universe. These factors are dimension components of the infinite dimensionality of complete mathematics.

Special Frames

The point is the origin; "while" it is also distributed within all systems expanding out of that origin. Therefore, time is compensated between systems defining separate frames that compose an overall frame. The rate of time will be reduced within a moving frame, relative to an external overall frame, to perfectly compensate for the additional definition of time imparted to the overall frame by that motion. The balance is as unavoidable as the existence of the point is; as the point delivers all time.

Gradient Frames

In delivering time, the point creates apparent finities relative to consciousness. These limitations are real with respect to each other and the consciousness they encompass. In the absolute sense they are an illusion; as any definable system component is ascribed by infinite cycles of the point.

The apparent finities create a relative constriction of time as an attribute of density of subsystems. The more subsystems within a given volume of time delay, the slower will be the rate of time among those systems relative to a larger frame. In that larger frame, an object experiences an influence of acceleration in the direction of increasing density of systems.

A gradient of time is defined throughout the systems here. The closer an object is to the dense collection of systems, the slower its rate of system time will be. The object itself is a collection of systems of systems, ad infinitum. A gradient of time exists within the object; with time running slower at its end closest to the dense collection of systems. This holds true whether the object is held stationary or is falling freely in acceleration. It will fall in acceleration because of the gradient, due to the requirements for existence of the component systems of the object. They must re-exist in their cycles in the direction of greater density, because the loss in rate of time must be compensated for by motion required for balance in the special frame. For a random variety of starting motions within the object, those heading away set up a lesser requirement for further motion than those heading toward the increasing density. Since these motions are bound together as the definition of relationships that is the object, the net effect is that the object falls. Its falling compounds its necessity to move; so it falls in acceleration.

If this were only a special frame, we would expect that all the slow clocks in the collection should be slow because they are in motion together, across a greater frame that is gaining the definition of time within itself as that coordinated motion of all of those instances of the point. Instead, motion exists in plummeting objects that increase the density. The collection is under a growing influence over itself to stay together, in opposition of exclusionary forces.

In the long run, the exclusionary forces are overcome by gravitation, creating a black hole. The needed compensatory motion is "then" the giving birth to a bang, relative to a viewpoint in a phase of time beyond our horizon to that black hole. Another way of seeing this balance in motion is as the relationship between our big bang and the eventual draining of all those clocks into the distribution of black holes concentrated at the center of all galaxies.

All examples of time gradients are components of the flow of time from one horizon to the other horizon of a phase of time. This is a view of the systemology of dimensionality, relative to consciousness. The horizons, at both ends, are a view of the point. Those points of phase of time exist repeatedly in rapid succession within all mass particles as well, at all levels of component dimensionality quantization.

Time gradients might be synthesized. This would constitute inordinate motion, as does a rocket leaving Earth, or even a locomotive for that matter. Inordinate motion is the natural component of reality we experience and produce as development within higher dimensionality. It is based on lower dimensionality, so actually it is ordinate, in the respect that it stems from our fundamental balance. Its inordinate character involves consciousness as a director, that places its process at a right angle to ordinate vector status. It always produces a slowing of internal system time with respect to its original, base-dimensional, home system frame; because that starting definition was a component of the given balance between overall Universal expansion and distributed gravitation. The balance always produces a constant zero, as the central and distributed point; so the accelerated system obtains a relative loss of time, regardless of the direction of its travel, among the expanding components.

Unlike conventional acceleration, a synthetic time gradient would modify inertia in perfect proportion. In other words, you, your ship, and the rest of its contents would "fall" in whatever direction you traveled. All of the items within the gradient frame would maintain their relative positions, regardless of any motion-changing maneuvers produced by altering the gradient. Getting involved with this would entail some serious modifications to your conditioned thinking.

Consciousness

Consciousness is the relative meaning of an energetic train of logic patterns, to itself over time; permitted to modify itself through self-interaction in context to environmental interaction.

This is process in higher fundamental dimensionality. It is supported by process contributions that work together from various levels and modes of origin; differentiated out of the memory that is the surviving DNA-cell interactions.

One of the more overt levels of function is the general input-to-brain-to-output flow of conscious process. This is the gross structure of neural organization. Within this is a general feedback function that delivers anticipatory stimulation toward the source of information. The cycles set up by this arrangement grow progressively more specific in their origin of memory, and their action of mating with the incoming logic stream. There is often about ten times as much feedback as feed-in, which supports association of sequential variations. Over time, memory can develop the process of generating 90% of the perceived image as an accurate contrivance, based around the 10% of the image that is actually coming in. Perception is mostly familiarity.

Within this structure is a finer mechanism that supports association. Synapses are strengthened disproportion-ately by coincident timing of stimulation to a neuron’s dendrites, when the sum of that stimulation is sufficient to elevate the neuron’s firing rate. Future coincidental stimulation of those synapses will have a greater likelihood of elevating the firing rate. A partial set of coincident stimulation will stand available for association with new concurrent elements.

Meaning is composed of relative timing. A same neural response pattern can follow the stimulation of a "C" sound from the word "cat" or the word "catsup." The subsequent sound stimulations act as a combination unlock into our associative memory potentials. The component sound response patterns of the other letters start out as ones used in other words as well. Their order of occurrence acts to involve unique combinations of somewhat universal connections. The combinations act as unique meaning, over time, and over repetitions of time, with respect to much past patterning produced in the whole memory base. The wholeness of a memory base is defined in its accumulated connectedness, and by the reality of the representational meaning that it has supported, as definitions of moments of time, with respect to the sum of such action, over time.

Individual neurons may memorize specific patterns of concurrent stimulation among their dendrites. Familiar patterns might impart enhanced response frequency of spike production. The mechanism supporting this function may have developed out of cell repair routines, responding to the stress of external stimulus. The routines may have tapped RNA’s capacities for process memory.

Taken together, these factors of system function support the creation of association loops over shorter and longer spans of time. The elements of an image act to associate with each other in defining the image, as well as in defining the anticipation that relates a series of images together as temporal experience, and temporal memory.

Over the longer term, association is bridged by constant-progressive stimulation keying. This memory is developed over longer periods, and supports longer term anticipation. It acts as a hub around which short term memory sequences can be called upon in various orders for various functions. The hub is imposed upon the general cortex by the positive feedback loops of the hippocampus. The hub is distributed.

Closely involved with this system of emphasis is our sense and stimulation of autonomic conditions related to our survival status. Neural participation is generally constricted into a more useful focus of associative progression. Heavier emotional experiences will entail greater neural support, improving memory for survivability. Specific chemical signatures also improve focus or memory, by tuning neurons into enhanced participation through selective synaptic sensitization, by association established in prior chemical contexts.

Beyond the individual, the environment holds a slowly changing memory we refer to as culture. This memory is a basis upon which conscious times can interact as a higher order system. We are moving up a knowledge stairway, with the developments of data interaction. The acquisition of knowledge about reality, by reality, has taken place in acceleration; as could be plotted by a function like f(x)=e^x. This is approximately exemplified by the spacing of our cultural milestones. This sort of equation would apply to an average progression of knowledge developed on planets of the cosmos.

Consciousness is an accumulation of fundamental dimensionality to its level. It is a natural product of the Universe. It is integrated with the ongoing expansion of dimensionality. As evolution produces consciousness, dimensionality is making an integrated transition from the memory of time and energy of chemistry to their neuro-synaptic support of the representational memory of overall relationships. This memory of patterns is integrated to the roots of our chemical basis; also being instances of DNA, protein, compounds and elements. In many cases, the systems formed of these subsystems are not conscious... bacteria and lower multi-cellular organisms do not involve sufficient world representation to build self-awareness with.

I suspect that we will recognize a distinction in dimensionality between instantaneous consciousness and the consciousness of a life span. The former exists as a nine dimensional object of current interaction representation pattern memory. That object exists over time in ten dimensions, to bring us back to our parallel with uniform motion; continuing the repetition of dimensional character arriving in groups of three. In other words, the transition from nine to ten dimensions of time, is analogous to the model for the fourth dimension as a construct of sequential three dimensional frames. The up-to-date accumulation of your experiences in reality defines the current condition of your ongoing consciousness as a ten dimensional object.

These objects are the integrated emergence of that tenth level of dimensionality, arising out of their dimensional basis. We can view the various definitions of overall conscious life spans as forming a parallel with change of time, as energy does with respect to uniform motion. Your different life spans are this change in continuous conscious times.

As each complete life span fully defines a ten dimensional particle, each bang fully defines an eleven dimensional one, while all of the bangs are our twelve dimensional rule-tree point. Ten dimensional times of consciousness interact in culture as the next, eleventh, integrated level of dimensionality. This progresses toward possible compatibility with Universal civilization; more or less contributing to the single eleven dimensional phase of time per bang.

We don’t know if Earth will develop to make this connection, through modes of interaction we would experience overtly. Our inability to actually see the future leaves us with a joyful sense of freedom. Free will is the true experience of human decision making, within the bounds of opportunity, consequential experience, and the quality of anticipatory construction. It is conscious process. At times we "flow," allowing this process to feel as automatic as it is. We have to make choices, though we can feel that we are letting ourselves choose. Even if we choose to do nothing, we are fulfilling a choice; as well as a hierarchy of sub-choices — to sit or stand, to lean or fall; to let the world deal with us as it will, or to take charge of things as best we can, with what the Universe has provided. To the degree that we fight nature, we work against ourselves in the long run. If we are lucky, we develop negative emotions from our errors in time to utilize them in motivation toward surviving development. Luck is perceived by the partial knowledge of consciousness. The complete facts of the Universe are the fate that produces conscious times.

It is the mathematical nature of reality that makes mathematical thinking such a useful tool. When mathematical logic makes sense, and seems to work right, it is because reality is composed of such logical relationships and developments. For example, when we symbolize the accumulation of groups of items as an addition problem, it is useful because reality includes numerous instances of additive process. It is reality that is truly mathematical, while mathematical thinking is another real process that models mathematical attributes of reality on those occasions when the two processes are associated. The thought process, whether concerned with math at the moment or not, is itself logically systematic, embodying the moving mathematical behavior of thought functions, as an interdependence of associative inductions and responses. Though it is much more complex in full detail of source composition than the functional surface of familiar addition processes of our culture, brain function is functional as relative response patterning over time. It is a complex aggregation of related reactions; from the changing definition of specific neuron involvement, to the ion flows supporting all the spikes, to the behavior of the electrons and nuclear systems. The functions of matter, and the matter itself, of all process in reality are describable in terms of mathematics because they have that mathematical character and behavior. What this book has attempted to suggest is that this is true to the heart of reality; that there is no limit whereby we run up against non-mathematical substance or will power. Both of these characteristics of reality are active geometric dimensional characteristics of the point, with respect to the consciousness they include.

At times I think I can see some of these ideas at work together, in everyday situations... things that were puzzling may seem to be explained. For example, multiple conversations — how can you pick out a specific voice and follow it, whilst a bunch of other voices may be much louder? Meaning... your train of thought is largely constructed by the ongoing meaning — not just in terms of various restrictions as to where you consciously and sub-consciously expect the train to be heading; but also in terms of the unique acoustic pattern meaning associated with that train.

The anticipatory mechanism works over numerous levels of time. Over the frame of seconds or minutes it can support the capacity to pick out a specific conversation amongst a conglomeration of speech at a party, or at the beach. You get on that particular train of thought, and the inherent meaning of the train helps you maintain a focus on that particular energy component of the air. Audio direction sense helps too; again by associative facilitation of anticipation for the specific direction vector, as defined by incoming timing relationships between essentially identical such audio images. Many such factors don’t just help us pay attention; as though "us" is that "little man in your head" who gets the processed results. The primary process of self-relevant meaning is the attentiveness; it is the consciousness at attention. It "chooses" the components of itself, by virtue of their associative pertinence to the ongoing meaning. The pertinence of a thought element is the key to its participation, or to its diversion of the mainstream process. While many elements will fade out before they can get involved, the ones that are involved are the ones that could successfully act as their own key to participation, by virtue of the relative meaning they contribute, and elicit.

Another puzzle, not so everyday, involves the injection of audio noise into a low level audio signal — it becomes easier to hear. This time the effect may be due to enhancement of the "kick-start" factor — more neurons are awoken to get involved in the effort to discern. How can random noise help? By chance, it gets some neurons involved that can help, while the others, in majority, that get sparked up, are brought up as random components, which do not carry meaning, and therefore do not contribute to, or interfere with, consciousness. The most they can do, without supporting awareness directly, is to spread the random stimulation factor; which may then dredge up pertinent involvements.

For the old question about a tree falling in the woods, this philosophy proposes that the general structure of the process of our reality is the same whether a person is there or not. The wood cracks, there are frictions and percussions; the air vibrates. It vibrates eardrums if they are present; otherwise it vibrates the rest of the trees, etc.

This philosophy would have you consider a whole different tree deal... the rule tree structure of reality(ies). The rules act relative to one another, within a given tree; producing beings among the process that is the active rules forming a given tree. If there is no tree, no one hears anything. There are all of the trees there can be. The one we’re in shows us there is at least one; and that it provides for consciousness to arise in the direction of improvements. Together, the hypotheses suggest that the tree is mostly consciousness; your consciousness at different times; and that a tree falling is composed, internally, of you hearing everything.

This is a tree that falls together, as gravity focuses process into points such as planets and beings.

It is possible that the reason any tree, or any thing, makes any sound, is because its all made of consciousness. The interactions of reality proceed at many various distances from conscious beings, with and without their knowledge of their specifics. However, a point can only exist as a concept. The point generates consciousness in order to exist. Conscious existence survives by learning to deal with its source — the point. In so doing, its process generates all possible things, including noisy falling trees.

Freedom

The philosophy here does not suggest that we have no will of our own. It does not say that people don’t make decisions. It could be easy to assume that this is the meaning. It might take considerable time and effort to obtain the actual meaning that is being presented. Our will is defined as process over time, composed of atomic mechanics. These mechanics are related through communication into an overall mechanism, that is an energetic developmental logic progression. This is not abstract and foreign... it is actively you.

You may have seen the little man in your head, running the switch board, as portrayed on those 16mm grade school films. There is no little man. He does not receive the information, and decide to direct the process. The information has organized itself into systems that handle itself.

The process is the experience of itself. It is constructed by reality — by the Universe — it is an integrated component of the Universe, within the scheme of dimensionality as processes. Process leads to more process. We call some of this decision, and we feel as though it is issued by the little man who is aware. The process involves many little men as members of society acting to integrate their processes in one way or another. The desire to have your man come out on top is the source of the perception that there is such a little willful man in your head. The processes integrate, one way or another, generating awareness.

Your identity is simply everything you agree with. None of us really knows our self, ahead of time; as we don’t have time to check ourselves out thoroughly — you are everything you would agree with, to the extent that these potentials exert some influence within your actions. If we could split you in half, this would differ, more or less, depending on which questions you were presented with, in what order, at what age and stage of development; in the same way that your beliefs are built by the order of arrival of the information you process. Some things would never change, or turn out differently, due to their meaning in relationship with your specific genetic and environmental particulars. Some would-be truths, though, are precluded by the prior use and acceptance of others. The things you agree with, and would agree with, add up to the you that experiences your decisiveness.

The thing that is really different between you and me is not the ultimate "who" that we are as the experience of experiencing reality — this can become any mix of semi-accepted truths, and you continue to remain being you experiencing things. What is different is a special kind of when that we are. Though we seem to be happening at the same time, I am different time of yours. You are when I mesh with complex time, as you are doing. Everyone who is aware is aware because they are time when you know what they have learned, as the meaning of that information to its overall self. The information doesn’t know its supposed to be a certain person, as opposed to any other person — it’s just information. It knows itself as the time it defines. As itself, it is not all the time. It knows itselves at those other times. We can know this by thinking honestly about the split brain paradox.

There is only process. Dimensionality is process. There is no such thing as static dimensionality, except as an active idea, abstracted from reality, during reality. Such factors are integrated within the overall process of reality. All of reality’s attributes are related through direct or indirect interdependencies, cast as the fabric of photon relationships. Dimensions can only be perceived by process — consciousness is higher dimensional process. Dimensions only exist as attributes of relative processes.

If there were only one process — a single photon "flight" — reality would only be that simple. There would be no awareness of the event, attempting to describe it to other awareness systems. The event would be zero dimensional, because we have proposed that there are no other systems being related at either end of the single photon phenomenon.

This is imagined, as an isolated reality. Conscious reality is not composed of isolated phenomena. Any phenomenon is grounded in reality by its source and destination phenomena. Total reality is completely complex; and is equivalent to the above single-photon model, as the point.

The relationship between the particle Universe and the wave Universe is that the particle is a lower dimensional source of time, constituent to the higher dimensional wave Universe properties; which, in turn, sum to act as a particle for yet higher dimension levels, etc.

On the surface of things, we perceive our will as something other than its root composition. We distill it down to specific you’s & me’s; and regard these entities as ultimate sources of decision. Decision is experienced as a very simple thing, at times; though it is always a product of vast complexities of reality. Such self-illusions are typical of brain function. Our brains have us believe that the world is composed of colorful objects, for example; when we now know that all substantial things are composed of ongoing atomic processes, involving virtually identical building block processes of protons and electrons; and that it is the relative timing of those processes that yields the perception of colors.

The hypotheses here are connected to the notion that the brain produces this summatory surface experience because consciousness itself is the relative meaning that develops in brain function. In cases of brain malfunction, different sorts of results can occur to the process of will. For example, one can shave and dress only one side of himself, thinking the whole job has been done; because the information gets processed to yield that perception (really, this really happens).

Your will is a process over time — no matter how quickly you decide to react. You react to the world, often in context to the effects you have had on the world to change it in some way or another; usually involving direct or indirect personal survival concerns. One thing leads to another; and the course of events impresses partial representations of the events into the memories of the participants. The memory includes sequential relational information that provides us with anticipatory clues for future reference. Our memory also provides us with the simplified notion that the world is composed of an arrangement of static objects, at any given moment. While we think this, our brains are actively producing the relative timing of processes that have been, or are being, impressed on us by the environment. The environment, too, is an active set of processes; no matter how serene it may seem. Your will is a process over time, based on the intelligence you have gathered. How well you gather it, and how much you desire to do so, is a product of the overall system — the environment and the genetic development of all involved, directly and indirectly; more so the more direct the involvement and/or bearing on pertinent interests such as joy and survival. This process succeeds, or fails, to instill a sense of responsibility within your selves.

We don’t have freedom in the literal sense of the word; but that sense is often at the basis of our perception of free will. You learn to want to do the things you think you might be able to do. They are the things you want to do because those examples are programmed into your very being. Among others, they resonated with memory of prior experiences and examples. The you that perceives is an active construct of its experiences. In this light, the most important aspect of those experiences is the inherent air of potentialities. Of those, perhaps the most important factor producing the perception of free will, is the potential to modify the source and nature of future information as potentialities. As we do so, we associate our efforts with the various degrees of enjoyment and advantages they produce.

In the limited contexts of our experiences, nothing is ever repeated exactly the same way (though certain component attributes can come very close to doing so, compared to the average of stuff) — there are always differences, be they subtle or coarse; and moreover, the world around those things is ever changing. We don’t just learn about things that excite us; our experience shows us that the prospects of novelty are exciting. We learn about various means of obtaining that excitement, and constantly try new combinations of those ingredients in order to cull out new examples of success. All the while we are following the rules. The laws of physics never stop during this; for they are the time. The time is its rule tree. The rules are not recorded in a great book, and imposed from a distance. They are the process of reality. They are ever-present, everywhere.

We have familiarity with the rules as the simpler basis of dimensionality of time. Our conscious processes are the enactment of a more complex basis of higher interactive dimensions of times. In the long run, we contribute to a relatively simple basis of yet higher dimensionality, over yet "longer" times, or other time of time. Our influence there, however minuscule, is the stuff of reality. It sums with all of its parallel versions, that we have been, and will be, in other cycles, to produce the reality there. Such sources are constantly producing our reality as well; including our options and decisions. The ultimate product here is its own source... and it goes the same way we do... it is yet more of us — you — in other time frames. In this sense, your will is absolute... though infinitely remote and diluted with its other selves. Its your consensus that gets the jobs done. It is your multiplicity that has free will. In comparatively miniature, simplified short form, your brain works the same way.

You have a will, though it isn’t the thing we usually think of when we use the term. Your will is integrated with society. It is a quality of society. It is not a thing isolated from society. It is a product of time. It is a development of time’s components. It is a component of time. It is an attribute of reality. These factors produce your individuality. These things hold true, even while you decide to be extreme in individuality by taking to being reclusive. You are always a product of all details of your past experiences. Those details contribute to your decisions regarding levels of social participation, as well as its character.

We have a desire to believe that our will power transcends the rule structure of the Universe... that we use the rules... they do not compose us. This desire prevents us from viewing our actions as significant extension components of that structure. When we assume that we are using the rules, they are composing us. When we think we are learning more of the rules, they are constructing us.

Our actions carry out the will of the Universe. Our actions must become compatible with themselves and nature — they must resonate as cooperation — to survive in the long run. Otherwise they turn out to be reinforcement for the definition of the typical basis of growth, not the growth itself. We sometimes are an example of possible potential, that turned out not to have had that potential to continue from such a definition make-up. Our atoms more or less recycle themselves into other associative attempts to allow your emergence into experiential glory.

The "strivings" of ants are a spectacular array of biochemical accomplishments. And this glory is further embellished by the individual sacrifices of ants defending their overall operations; though we can’t very well imagine any sort of experience going on there. The fundamental nature of chemical reality is glorious, in untold variety and degrees. While anything the Universe does must be regarded as glorious, to assess the short-lived trials of striving societies as glorious can be destructive as an example; if it stands to be subscribed to as a choice course of action... if it serves to motivate destructive behavior. This is unfortunate, not glorious. It is always you that it is unfortunate for, directly and indirectly. The glory is internal, as a source of the overall basis from which harmonious successes arise.

If we learn to love the Universe rather than fear it, the probability distribution for our longevity will be greatly extended. To be motivated toward this direction is to subscribe to a choice of course that develops further. The other road may be an unavoidable necessity, in terms of probabilities. It is comparatively statistical. Its value is in the contrast it provides, not in an attraction. And, for all we know, it never really gets any worse than it has here on Earth. To imagine such failure is sufficient for constructing better motivation. Nowhere would the power of imagination be more useful or valuable; or would it better serve as an active sample of consciousness developing in the direction of order. You can't get an ‘F,’ because you have to still be here to get it. We will do well to recognize those factors in our past that would give us an ‘F’ if they could, before we lose the chance to get anything.

True glory cannot be contrived by inflicting pain and suffering. Glory can be attained by us all, through peaceful cooperation. Our technological development can lead to its misuse along the former lines. It can also awaken us to our higher capacity for love. What peace we had... to find time for our love, and our loving work... was glorious.

The abuse of glory assessment not only motivates war on "our" behalf — it spreads throughout the world community. It would be better to think of the fighting spirit as an unfortunate facet of early development. We have much to focus on that is truly glorious, in our past and future... everything we have done to work toward harmonious cooperation can serve as motivation toward spectacular development.

Our tendency toward war and ecological destruction could be an avoidance technique... we may be striving to hide from some simple truths of reality, out of conditioned induction; as a sort of metered panic. Perhaps it wouldn’t be so bad if we let ourselves really get into it. This suicide of ours is not glorious or courageous. It takes courage to face reality, and to work toward survival. Our glory is distributed among the developing planets; where such cooperative endeavor has succeeded, and where it has failed; for it is the loving endeavor that produces some cases of success, that carry the ball, to give a basis like ours its shots. The math that we are isn’t just a pile of bland numbers; it is active dimensionality, beyond anything we can presently imagine.

Our attitudes are glorious where they promote our attunement with the natural course of the Universe. This takes place at all levels of culture. It is equally glorious for a cave man to learn to use rocks and fire, as it is for a modern medicine man to modify DNA. What is particularly not glorious is to consider the latter accomplishment to be more glorious than the former... the latter can thank the former for leading to itself... for being a part of the nature that provides all of our opportunities. It is great in and of itself, in context with its times; and it is great as a mode that produces a family of future.

In this attunement, we can admire any such accomplishments if we do not qualify them with respect to each other. We can respect them by incorporating that spirit in the context of our own endeavors. We can identify with them, rather than be jealous or envious of them. Admiration becomes a negative thing when it is used to set one’s self apart and below the qualities we want to respect... when it is used to essentially take the day off because Joe Shmoe is the acclaimed accomplisher of that which we should no longer hope to achieve, contribute to, or emulate.

What we have done to defend our civilizations is glorious. What we do to take advantage of our fellow societies is not.

If we, as the people of Earth, were to decide to collectively contribute a small percentage of our efforts, directly or indirectly, we might smoothly shift from our current energy base to non-destructive alternatives, in time to survive. We are all victims of what we’ve come to think we can get away with. Mother nature must follow her rules. We can’t change the rules by ignoring them. We can’t legislate scientific principles. Our political will is not that powerful. We do not have that freedom. We must learn to utilize scientific laws, in order to survive. They are running the show, as they produce consciousness. Where they convince us to use them correctly, we continue to develop.

It would be ironic that these conflicts flair up, one way or another, over our dwindling supply of hydrocarbons, while that mode of advancement may have already undermined our survival. We may find the strength to work together to provide our common need, even though it may already be too late; because we don’t know. Our final effort then, would be one of glory. Our history would not be in vein; for we would have finally tried to be one. The many planets that try this, sooner or later, are the source of the few races that succeed. The system may well be set up to require love for survival. That’s what DNA is trying to find, in all possible variety.

Of course, if it’s too late, then the only thing that makes sense is to just have a big party (essentially what we’re doing... we just aren’t too good at it because we think we’re still trying to avoid death). It’s too bad we don’t know. So long as we are uncertain, we should attempt to be responsible toward our own future, so that it may hold an even greater joy. It would be nice if science could reach an honest consensus about the time frame for global warming. Everyone agrees that we are doing it; we just don’t know when to expect what effects. The nasty factor here is the possibility that there will be no opportunity for feedback-driven response... that the effects will be inextricably building upon themselves by the time we can recognize them. So far, they are buried in the baseline "noise" of variations that fall within recorded extremes. We are looking for turbulence — out of place "swirls" in the climate — prolonged extremes, both hot and cold, as well as short term records. These are the expected symptoms of an overall increase in the average temperature, by a few degrees. Once you get something like the weather moving "off course," it could take on stubborn factors of chemical/physical momentum. My own personal gut feeling is that we are still a few years away from the possibility of producing run-away conditions in the atmosphere... and it seems possible that the system, in general, has a self-righting quality — casting off uncaring societal developments without totally disintegrating as a support system for further evolutionary trials... or even further technological trial, under much duress. I suspect that we will not alter our course sufficiently to avoid that experiment.

Where are the choices here? Where is that precious freedom we spilled so much blood for? Don’t we have a choice besides life in a test tube? Actually, no. Whatever we decide to try will be a test. But where’s the "decide?" What button do I push? Oh well... for all you know, we may be unwittingly counteracting an oncoming ice age.

If what really matters is how well you learn to enjoy life, then it might not seem to make much sense to consider any of this junk. All books should only paint rosy pictures. The conundrum is in the self-fulfilling contribution toward the outcome. To give up on humanity is to take the attitude of an addict... short-term fulfillment without regard to the future. Or, maybe we need more rosy pictures, as examples of what we might accomplish. If we dwell too well on the negative, that process could shape our future in negative ways. We probably need both things.

It’s not a sacrifice to take the responsible choice. We can try to succeed, no matter how fruitless the odds may seem. This will not pre-empt what little joy there could have been. This is the method that occasionally produces the greatest joy there can be. It would not ever happen if the method were never tried. That we have all this stuff in the form of atomic systems would seem to indicate that the method gets tried quite consistently, statistically. You can know this as well as you can know anything for sure; so why not go for it?

The old adage "better safe than sorry," would seem to apply here, more than ever; for the question is one that the whole Earth could face. Yet our attitude is generally more of "what are you going to do about it," rather than one of a firm organized assault on the problem. It’s the old conditioned thinking deal; here with regard to how we size up our enemy... we aren’t too used to looking for him in the mirror. This thinking has historically been focused on "other people," not our basic methods of survival, productivity, and advancement.

I wish I could know there will be Hydrogen pumps wherever I need to go. In facing the practical world, it seems like all I can do is wish. And this isn’t even the main problem anymore. We need to develop deployment of chemically harmonious alternatives to the coal burning that is scheduled to expand at a devastating rate. Technological history is not providing a good example for general world development.

Our competitive attitudes are important to developmental processes, but they can become counter-productive if they are carried to extremes. We might imagine a misconception about reality that could foster this outbreak; stemming from faulty assessments of evolution and entropy. Entropy is a lower dimensional attribute of reality, out of which the higher dimensional attributes develop as evolution. The earth’s crust is ever becoming more organized over the ages, relative to conscious knowledge acquisition.

Order here is considered to be those attributes of process that promote consciousness, and knowledge acquisition, for the furthering and security of consciousness. Under this definition, chaos that is entertaining, such as is used in comedy, is order.

The transition of evolution out of entropy begins with a heavy emphasis on competition for survival. The development of awareness introduces an attribute of compassion within the process. Higher reasoning yields the understanding that we are all one. Love raises the process to a higher level. The process becomes integrated with Universal civilization. The key is the development of the desire to associate this way — to reach higher understanding of reality.

For every so many planetary cases that may go this way, we can imagine that some number of cases ride the competitive edge back down into entropy; citing those features of reality as an excuse to be selfish. It would be ironic that the alternative long-term success is the more "selfish," in recognizing self-love through social harmony.

We might imagine the one thing in order to do it, and imagine that other thing in order to avoid creating that reality. We have an opportunity to promote loving order.

One might ask; if there is a higher civilization, why doesn’t it come to our rescue? I’m guessing our society is in a stage of development that parallels pre-birth. We haven't got our act together yet, well enough to be ourselves, let alone to deal with an unknown "outside world." The question assumes that we know about all there is to know. The answer is that we are very sheltered. Let’s attempt to put ourselves in the shoes of higher order, and view our history and current condition.

Many thoughts come to mind. First; what needs to be rescued here? Perhaps some individuals could benefit more than others. Do you suppose they could just land and say we’re here, but we only want to help Joe, Ted and Mary. Do you suppose they could arrive with trunk loads of money, sprinkling it down from the heavens? Money is a social thing. It is a sort of bookkeeping system. How well received do you suppose they’d be if they showed up, and immediately started tampering with the books? What you want to know is why they don’t just tell us how to cure AIDS, cancer, and..., and...; where does it end?

Our problems are our problems. They are integrated with our development. They have been important motivational factors of human civilization. They are teaching us how to think, and how to teach. To some extent, they are bringing us together. When we become compatible with ourselves, it may then become possible for us to be compatible with higher civilization. I don’t think we could have been successfully receptive to higher influences, even in very recent history. We are driven too much by regional interests. We may not be capable of assimilating higher reasoning, or its products. We may need to develop more. However, the time may be approaching where no better alternative is left but to make bolder attempts at it; and our behavior in recent history may have already elicited the beginnings of such an approach.

Every time a UFO shows up at a war scene, it’s saying "is this really what you want to be doing? Look what we can do instead!" Think about how we are, and how we were in the late 40’s... it is possible that we shot them down, literally. I think they’re still providing us with gentle notices... like little crop signs that say "do you know what you’re doing to your food source?" And maybe there’s a free chemistry lesson there.

Its the development of our society as a whole that has higher potential value in higher civilization. Our value, to them, is for us to find our happiness, with no more help than we want or need.

In so doing, we will be learning to follow the rules, in our own way. This may develop into something essential, in ways we cannot currently appreciate.

Science has many useful answers to the questions of reality. So does common sense. Common sense is well-known modes of behavior; widely accepted... it’s widely conditioned thinking. Where we have not yet found answers, we may be preventing ourselves from seeing them. This might be because some of our answers are wrong. It is possible for wrong solutions to yield limited useful applications. Without the benefit of knowing how much more useful the alternative solutions are, there is no awareness of a problem. I suspect that our major "problem" was to approach specific investigations intensively, with an attitude of competition toward other specific endeavors. As a result, we have been slow to knit our various truths into an overall truth of relationships. To do so requires some modification to each subset, that does not alter its specific powers of deduction.

Many of the suggestions here can be argued against by citing established notions of science; and I would be quite surprised to learn that there are no errors here. To develop the focus as presented, I have had to generally ignore details. I would probably get horrible grades in school for most of the subjects I have utilized. For that price, I may have developed a "new" subject; a subject composed of the surfaces of many other established subjects. I cannot also perfect it. This is the subject where you really, honestly, try to put all the subjects together. You could call it everything; though I’d rather call it "You."

Our science to date is true to the extent that it is applicable. The unanswered questions require an expanded use of our concepts, with applicable associations. To begin this, we must earnestly face the questions. We are sometimes being diverted from the answers by focusing our attention within tight limits, due to the usefulness we have found in doing so. I am suggesting that depth perception might be useful; and that it might increase the usefulness of our familiar tools.

Our anticipatory construction is intimately involved with the development of our survival techniques, produced over time. Many basics stand up over long periods of time. This takes place in our culture, as well as within a given brain, as products of products, over time. Math formulation development, for example, builds on itself over time, creating new starting points for consecutive discoveries. These are forms of long-term anticipatory mechanics that help us survive.

The subject of freedom can be regarded as one that is restricted to behavior that is "off the cuff"... spontaneous. We must focus on this mode if there is to be any hope of capturing your illusive will, by way of example. The subject isn’t being presented that way here. Instead, free will is included in a view of reality that is without limits, in all possible manner. Limits define the impossible, while serving to provide for the imagination of it. Reality is infinite in source detail, and in eventuality. It is everything that happens, by the rules, and it is not what doesn’t happen. What doesn’t happen includes an infinite amount of seemingly ordinary, as well as bizarre, stuff. In this, spontaneous behavior involves rapid, pre-programmed mechanics. Intelligent behavior is always just that — behavior derived out of intelligence — nothing more, nothing less. You often use intelligence without regard for where you got it; but this doesn’t alter the fact that you got it. A great deal of behavior of process of reality isn’t even conscious; though all of that may only amount to a tiny residual of its conscious sources; of the internally, fully evolving atom-times. Or, maybe it’s exactly half. The view from the pinnacle of evolution could be extremely different than anything our human flow could possibly imagine.

We turn toward a fully comprehensive, completely broad view of reality, involving the topics of infinite cycles, and the point... infinite arcs; then begin to work our way into the details of ongoing experiential reality. In this way, we will begin our attempt to avoid dealing with the subject on the basis of hollow terms.

The philosophy here, for the most part, does not argue against our established, useful notions; rather, it roughly weaves them together, as it begins to define the interiors and exteriors of the components of reality we’ve regarded to be of limited, or no, usefulness or understandability.

As you come to recognize that reality is this mathematical description of itself; you may also see that such a "case" as ours is unavoidable. Indeed, you may also see that you can’t really formulate an alternative concept. Words such as substance and will power are the hollow undefined ideas — they are unexplained pacifiers that lack component definitions — they could be a refuge that avoids the glare of the simple truth. Many of us may be hiding this way, driven by a subconscious fear; while we are sincerely endeavoring to surmise the truth consciously. To a large extent, this could be a reciprocal result of conditioned thinking. Our fundamental beliefs are engendered by fear, to become part of our culture, which promotes that fear with its teachings. It is ironic that if you face these fears, you find that there is far less to be afraid of than you were before you did. We wouldn’t have to walk softly and carry a big stick if we weren’t afraid of fear, or some such slogan. It seems like the only way to break these cycles is to inform all of our selves about why we really just want to be nice, instead of afraid. It would give us more than taking does.

The environment, including its people, is constantly guiding your decision making process. It does so with its current "present," with pertinent information, or with interruptions/diversions. It also guides you from the past, through your memory, and through the meaning held in culture, as sustained environmental meaning.

This hypothesis could have been called "will power" or free will. To apply your will, or to exercise will power, connotes freedom, but also implies an act of domination, or the production of some form of relative subservience resulting from the success factors we view to compose a process of will power. The iron will is often involved in conflicts. We will regard this as typical mandatory developmental action; and look ahead to definitions of expanding freedom, accepting the limits imposed by reality on our condition; yet we will emerge victorious in our discovery of the joy of symbiosis.

The overall hypothesis here does not guarantee this for Earth... it suggests that this is a foregone guarantee on successful planets in general. You know that it works ‘cause all this stuff is here. This knowledge would be your key to freedom; not an over-estimation of your immediate self as an isolated source of decision. Reality works.

Another reason to look for, and surmise, finitudes is that we gain a sense of conquering and possessing the items, by attaining sorts of exclusive tangibility of them. This limiting action would really be working the other way, though; reducing what could be obtained through the process of identifying with all of infinite reality.

We will approach the subject from a basis that recognizes reality to be the knowledge of the Universe, as collected through us... through you. The role of the individual is modified somewhat from our usual outlook. We will investigate the possibility that we have placed some divisions where they don’t belong, and are neglecting to place some where they do. We will say yes and no. Freedom and fate do not conflict. Freedom produces fate. Fate is the complete set of all possible freedom. In this we will recognize that freedom is limited, and that this is a very wonderful thing. You would hate freedom, and avoid facing reality if this were not true.

You have freedom on the surface of your subjective reality, while you don’t in a deeper sense. If this weren’t true, the mechanism that produced your birth would not exist... it would have been necessary for your current you to decide to create yourself. Ultimately, it would have been necessary for your unconscious ancestors of chemical evolution to decide to develop to the point of being you. The process develops out of lower orders of dimensionality that are not overtly conscious, and that don’t decide. These sources do not become non-factors in the ongoing development of reality; they remain the ultimate source of our logic progression. It exists; and it continues to be productive, eternally. We will consider this to be the nature of reality, irrespective of individual belief or understanding. We don’t create the truth by believing it to be what we want it to be. The truth constantly creates reality, including our choices and lies. It’s tools that make tools, that make it. Lies wear out, and usually lead to trouble, but they are real while they last. They have influenced our development.

Will power does exist, but not as isolated individuals. Will power is an integrated function we call society. There are no examples of will power developing and operating in a field-less vacuum, as a single person’s behavior. There is one example as a planet; or at least that seems to be an example, of semi-isolated intelligence. Will derives its decisiveness from examples inherent to the environment, that are building on themselves to produce progress.

Will power is motivation derived out of related processes. It is not an isolated entity that originates itself with regard to behavior, success, or failure. Causality has positive and negative vectors in mathematical reality. We call positive attributes will power; as they result in improvements for an overall kind of good. Negative attributes might bring limited "good" to an individual in the short term; but have a degenerative effect on the advancement of well being of society. We call this crime or other things; but it too is non-isolated in effect, as well as in origin.

We assume, from subjective experience, that our will is a source of decision that is isolated from other people’s wills, and the behavior of the environment — whatever these influences do, they no longer count once they’ve passed. Do your decisions arise out of a void, or are they based on pertinent knowledge you have accumulated? Do they anticipate qualities of interaction? They are a part of overall process.

People are a part of the environment. They are the focal points of higher dimensionality that is logical interactive process.

My brain is more complex than my Beepers program — however, for me to say that my brain allows the emergence of a willful force that overcomes the logical rules of chemistry, is analogous to saying that the Beepers develop the ability to overpower the logical rules that support their behavior. You can prove this doesn’t happen by starting identical parallel program conditions, and letting them run — they stay identical. Of course, a much more advanced program, given much time to learn from examples, might develop the ability to do machine language, and utilize its capacities to modify its own support structure. This is mildly analogous to taking an aspirin, or to modifying the DNA sequence of all the neurons, at the extreme. In all cases here, it will always hold true that the source of this development was the initial logical progression. Given the exact same starting circumstances, thoroughly inside and out, the same ongoing outcome will develop. What makes life interesting, and seemingly iso-willful, is the fact of differences between any two starting points (except for the overall case of complete infinite numbers of eternities). There is much in common that is identical. At the same time, each case of active viewpoint develops from a unique perspective. Its overall origin is the same single complete Universe, producing all of the complete infinite number of perspectives. Only by modeling this down to an oversimplified, isolated, finite system, as you can do with the Beepers, do we see identical logic progressions. Yet, if started with only a few minutes of real-world stimulus-interaction, such progressions can quickly become incredibly complex, and unpredictable by humans. Only an advanced, isolated, parallel running program could predict, or show, a given time frame constituency of its like-self, running behind in parallel time. It would, of course, be possible to model a Beeper’s outcomes on a bigger, faster computer, but not on a smaller one. Only this kind of approach will work — this is the math — no formula or string of formulas will work, short of something like a huge number of matrices in series, which would amount to a procedure of doing the computer work by hand. The Beepers are mathematics that involves time, extending through the dimensions of energetic patterning and memory.

Our individual wills form a collective will of society that is a whole dimensional step stronger as a factor of anti-entropy. At our stage of development, it is easy to dismiss this factor against the backdrop of our big bang. Universal civilization is a perfect complement, riding gravity into the next cycle. All the while, we are already inside the point, as the meaning it communicates to itself.

Will power is the anti-entropy factor we experience as our drives, that drive the logic progression of lower dimensional levels, to include higher dimensional phenomena, based on memory. Its done with communication; much of it verbal; all of it photonic. It is all an automatic progression. Consciousness is the creation of viewpoints among logic; where the logic gains a sense of self as a sense of self-determination. It cannot exist without the active logic. It is the active logic progression, interacting with itself and itselves, through higher dimensional ports atop the lower dimensional basis continuum of itself. That lower basis is a collection of yet more self-relative logic progressions, creating yet more of that consciousness, as those other times which infer our time to us.

The attribute of reality that is actually most free is entropy. Yet, this is the very quality that runs opposite to consciousness. Random factors of brain function do not contribute to awareness, because they do not produce representational meaning, relative to the overall, ongoing process of representational meaning flow. (This is referring to component actions of individual neurons among the representations produced by neurons, not your choice to think of a random sequence of ideas — such a trick, again, is a product of the prior suggestion to react, and learned problem solving routines.) In this light, it appears that when we say that we are free, we are wishing to be the very mode of process that cannot be what we are. Consciousness is order; and it produces order, which is expanded through the generations of our population.

If I like my coffee black, and you don’t, we would agree that mixing cream into a cup of it would pass as a definition of order relative to your needs, and as a definition of disorder to mine. When we site entropy as the overall "way of the Universe," it would be an example of over-applying observed truth. We observe, and make use of, our laws of physics. Sometimes we jump to conclusions (which I admittedly do quite a lot of), and extend the meaning of observations to a point that precludes other useful observations. In this case, entropy has prevented us from considering process as dimensionality that extends to include consciousness and its attendant organizational trends. We regard ourselves as a very lucky fluke; because we want to regard ourselves as ultimately containing a static soul that is the source of our decision. We want those decisions to be rewarded with possessable static stuff that is ours forever, while it is made even more precious by its inevitable departure into chaos. Since we don’t really know what the deal is, we can operate on the assumption that both of these things are true; leaning on one or the other, depending on our particular frame of mind at a particular moment.

I prefer to shift gears, as such, over a different, wider range of relative view of process. The void cannot decide or experience anything as a void — yet it is all of space and time, in its most complete entirety, as an infinite number of eternities. The void (the point) experiences everything as process; from the various points of view of all processes moving in conscious dimensions. Such process inherently takes the form of ongoing developmental attributes among general dimensionality. Ultimately, this trend expands to the point of its own basis of source of so-called "emergent" properties of otherwise inert matter. The probabilistic occurrence of the necessary opportunities for the "initiation" of chemical evolution are the integrated presence of higher dimensionality. It is all process — all of the dimensions are time, which is process, relative to other process such as thought. Thought, though, is "down the road" from chemical evolution. Its dimensions have roots through the emergent distribution of mathematical reality, down through component dimensionality, including entropy, through to the inherent ultimate product of evolution; as it cyclically re-exists within all particle-wave quantized developmental events.

Substance, will power, and entropy are among the concepts that give us justification to isolate lower dimensional entropy from the higher dimensional processes of evolutionary development. The dimensions of processes are integrated.

Mixing is not a blanket definition of disorder — it is an aspect of association which yields good and bad products; where the "good" overcome the "bad," by definition as survival. This has been true for molecules, cells, and organisms, as well as for cultures. We survived by organizing our efforts so as to improve opportunities, and thwart conflicts that diminish opportunities. We’re still working at it. What isn’t altogether clear is the bearing our approaches will have on the future of our environmental support system.

Mixing can be seen as the general process of energetic logic progression that is overall dimensionality of time. It includes our cultural associations, derived as long-term aspects of the inner mixing, and surrounding mixing, we see at many levels. One such level is chemistry. The geometrical shapes of the various atoms and molecules are products of association that reliably write the rules of a logic tree to include support over time for consciousness. Would-be viewpoints that would see a lack of such structure and reliability, can’t see, because they aren’t created as conscious systems. What we regard as component chaos is an infinite variety of other reference frames of yours, of their own self-relative order, very much like ours.

The outlook that the Universe is increasing disorder is subjective, and supportive of war and self-destructive modes of culture. It overlooks or underestimates the long term trends of evolution. A dust cloud is less orderly than an evolving planet. So far, the former has preceded the latter.

Perhaps we should replace the concept of "state" with memory. State: the facts of history in the Universe have no bearing on the current state of the particle (you always have a 50/50 chance of getting heads). The concept of state assumes that it is valid to consider time as something that is frozen for the benefit of our analyses and predictions.

The state of every system counts, as it fits into the flow of interactions. (If you toss a coin many times, you will almost always get close to 50% heads and 50% tails. Moreover, for any unusual event of series of events; if the time period of sampling is extended sufficiently, there will be an identically unusual event, or density of events, of the opposite polarity, so that for the case where the period is infinite, the proportion of 1s to 0s is exactly 50/50. It is fundamentally inherent to mathematical reality that random behavior naturally produces perfect order with respect to higher reference frames. While no coin flip has an awareness of needing to work toward a correct sort of averaging, the true component structuring of process reality is actions that produce those results over time, because they are such results over times of internal-external relationships.) Every time I think about it, I notice that the coin flipping is not stopping. Our subjective reality is never a state... it is always a flow. Even if some part of it can be considered to be stationary, that frozen system exists relative to all the other movement in the Universe. Also, something involved with ongoing reality is actively working to maintain that frozen quality. This defines ongoing reality, and affects our active thinking. Its lack of movement has a bearing on the flow of reality, whether it directly involves consciousness or not, since its activity would produce differences in some aspects of reality, that would affect others, and so on. A zero may as well be a one, with respect to its potency as a factor among logic. How it got one way or the other is a function, not of itself, but of the history of interactions that placed it there, relative to the ongoing mix of interactions, and non-interactions. When such a state is temporarily fixed, it stands as an element of memory that partially represents the history that produced that impression. As such, it stands to affect the ongoing process in accordance with that history. This continues to hold true when surrounding factors sooner or later elicit a transition to another state. This action, too, is representative of the history that produced it, as it contributes to a given collection of events over time within more or less functional process.

We would like to think that time can stand still — we wish we could hold our present state forever. This might be particularly true for you if you are adverse to the concepts within the hypothesis of You. All I can say is that you will feel the same way about your self, relative to any given self, with such an inclination. It’s always you you’re concerned about, every time you’re someone.

The state is a current attribute of constancy of the particle-system arrived at through real interactions over time, that comprise a higher dimensional view of reality. The state changes... reality makes it change; not just the particle. It is now what it is because of what it was in combination with what its interactive environment was. These facts are the logic progression that is leading to its future states of logic. The source of this is infinitely complex.

The hypotheses describe our point as the one true case of state. Its completeness, and the lack of relative otherness, in terms of relative-bearing rule structure of internal process, work as the completeness of time to stand as the one possible state — a mathematical point. This point is the fully-fine definer of process source within all interrelating systems. Together, all systems flow to create the point. This complete set includes all possible consciousness. Wonderfully, non-order is non-meaning; and consciousness is meaning; which results in a general association of increasing consciousness and developing order. Negative factors in life work to elicit responses that increase order, over time.

When we recognize improvements in our capabilities as coming out of prior decision, we tend to repeat those successes, and attempt to apply them to more or less related processes. This is the advancing, developmental attribute of reality that is accelerating in the face of lower dimensional entropical attributes. These dimensions of reality are processes that encompass decision making as an interactive, interdependent attribute of time, over time. This process is a form of "mixing" of thought component processes, that parallels the chemical associative processes we also regard as various forms of mixing. The parts of this mixing that advance and prolong consciousness are order, relative to conscious process. Our effort to excel is a product of natural development of chemical order, leading to chemical order in the environment, which, over the ages, has worked to help its own chemical basis of developmental source to produce more productive beings. This kind of chemical association is mixing that has produced ever-increasing order, relative to consciousness. With time, more atoms have been drawn into the various phases of life processes, as consciousness has emerged. From such a point of view, one can appreciate that it would be disorder, not order, for the component molecules of our atmosphere to naturally segregate.

Imagine living in a reality where the rules say that all exhaling will categorically cull itself into specific placement regions upon the globe. To get your nitrogen you have to go to Canada, and the oxygen is in China. Our attitudes about entropy have taken a form where such association is regarded as order, and the natural mixing we observe is regarded as disorder. This attitude stems from a lack of regard for life as a natural, inherent process of reality, on any given supportive playing field planet. Order has no meaning without consciousness. Indeed, I believe we will come to recognize that consciousness itself is the pinnacle of order; relative to humans, at least. For air to mix the way it does is natural order, relative to the necessity of this for life and awareness. It is necessary if there is to be relative meaning of order to itself, over time, such as our higher dimensional process. Such mixing attributes of reality are the order that acts as a foundation for evolution. Evolution follows from this premise in these rules, and builds upon it. It is useful for the dirt to keep out of the air pretty well, the way it does by gravity. It is useful because we are a product of evolution that developed relative to that general condition. The segregation of ozone out of specific areas of the atmosphere is anti-mixing that represents disorder to the well-being of our future. It is a threat to the continuation of development, relative to past conditions of opportunity.

To say that the Universe is increasing disorder, is to judge it to be defective... it’s wearing out... its a one-shot fluke of limited correctness; where those limits will be the cause of its one-way infinite diffusion in all respects. This makes our limited life all the more dear.

Whatever the Universe does, however it works, it is correct. It is the ultimate definition of truth. It is total reality. It is the definition of total correctness. We lack the resources of development to ascertain the overall status of this, one way or another. Compared to infinite totality of rule structure, we might as well be those cave men who have just discovered control of fire. We might use our experience as reasoning to conclude that one could never manufacture ice in the desert. We can’t know yet. I prefer to consider the anti-entropy progression, because it opens up a rich vein of possibilities.

Entropy is the aspect of reality that is most free; yet every atom involved that way is strictly adhering to the rules, as the interactive behavior of reality constantly proceeds. The concept of entropy could be a complete illusion.

Free behavior — such as quitting your job, or spontaneously taking a trip, or doing these things as planned — is an attribute of society that has a bearing on development; that serves as a basis upon which development can take forms to deal with such attributes in great variety. We need such breaks to keep us attendant to life. All work and no play would make work degenerate in quality and usefulness to survival. Why work if it doesn’t get you any fun? So, we tend to regard various forms of play or regress as attributes of freedom in life. Because this freedom enhances order, it is an important factor within the overall structure of developing order. Freedom is order, as these sorts of attributes of reality. Freedom is disorder when it is destructive, relative to a given system. We have had various phases of testing ourselves, as we have developed.

We want to think that freedom is free of the rules; yet the political mode we call "freedom" is only valuable because of the particular form it has taken, to follow the rules in such a way as to make more use of them. As always, behavior is the rules. The rules only exist in relative behavior; relative behavior only takes place as associative qualities of the rules.

The only true present is your sense of being. Everything around you is a present onto itself. Though it all seems to be going along at about the same time, its memory is switching with yours at an infinite rate; and our interactive communications are connecting various eternity bases together, across eternities we regard as light-feet or light-miles. We are infinitely big, and infinitely far apart, as the Universe logically connects this memory together with relative interaction, that we observe as light phenomena. It does the same thing internally, within particles, though that playing field is dimensionally shifted from the external view. Each particle is a different-time view of the total, and cannot see an outside. It has only to modify itself; producing our view of a multiplicity of particle cycles, in interaction. We will develop to take on such self-modification, to define each basis of developing conscious memory, as well as to define all inanimate objects of matter, of any size. Our freedom will contribute to the production of such a destiny. Our freedom is the product of such destinies.

Our judgment of personal freedom tends to get warped by our assessment of time. We neglect to recognize ourselves as a product of our experiences. The you that makes decisions is a construct of your past experiences. This includes the consequences of your past decisions. It also includes the factors of present circumstances that often involve enticements toward immediate or future involvements. With regard to this question of our sense of self-determination, an important ingredient also included here is the anticipatory bents that have developed out of the past interactions; out of the various rewards or problems produced by your interactive experiences.

Your decision-making process involves all of these sorts of factors, harmonizing and/or vying to produce a given sum-vector output of behavior. The source of your immediate behavior is the past and "present-past;" as this information contrives anticipatory information that "completes" the ongoing decision-making process. By the time we actually partially recognize the future we help create, it has become a part of the past. Our actions are a product of the real details of the past. Those details have worked over time to produce the mental mechanics that further the use of those details.

Choice is fundamentally priorities of emotional make-up. Choice depends on current environmental conditions and on the sum products of competing drives. These combine if possible. If the present problem is one we are accustomed to handling, then the course is essentially by rote — though this involves a great many particulars being handled by the sum of great detail of process. Otherwise, a dominant outcome of behavioral components triggers their associated needed rote routines; and we experience a new choice of direction, hoping to reach the anticipated destination.

Society is the developmental mix of such values; leading to new hybrid value factors. It is unique configurations of DNA/cell that develop in context with each other, on the environmental support matrix.

We are succeeding to fool ourselves when we think we really have absolute personal freedom. Our system of people imposes rules upon itself at every turn. What we mean when we say freedom, is that we have less oppression than exists in various neighboring conditions.

Freedom does work better than oppression — for the simple reason that motivation is enhanced through improved recognition of positive potentials of anticipation. It spawns its own sorts of trouble sources when too many of its anticipations are frustrated.

Freedom is not an ultimate isolated source of behavior. We enhance each other’s freedom by providing common opportunities, and the necessary supporting information required for enactment and utilization of those opportunities. We educate each other. We offer guidance. To a great extent, we do this through inductive examples, rather than through the "classroom" types of modes. We learn to anticipate problems and solutions, and we profit by sharing this wealth. As we do so, we are essentially unaware that the time of process is requiring this activity — it simply is this activity — in all dimensions. We can say that we choose to decide; but this is just a side-stepping linguistic maneuver that avoids recognizing that the process of choosing to decide is simple procrastination. We weigh our options, as part of ongoing process of time. We consider possible outcomes of available choices; or we just throw out a random action to prove that we can. This is produced by the process of our guts. Anything you do is going to involve learned skills, and/or innate mechanical capabilities of lower dimensional order than interactive social process. It is done to prove a point. That’s the motivation that drives the results. We try to go beyond feasible freedom when we attribute our actions solely to our individual selves, as though those "things" are ultimately isolated independent entities relative to each other; available for reward, punishment, and domination. The "thing" is the collection of such interacting influences.

Your motivations are built by the environment, upon the given framework of your genetics. Your motivations take time to develop — some take a very long time; others are relatively quick responses to the environment, or to your own thoughts and actions. A given motivation is its time. It is issued by its source mass as the conscious dimensions of process interactions.

Motivations are summations of memory-response produced by related sets of data installed by the environment. The data includes anticipatory, sequentially related information, that produces actions and emotional experiences, such as desire. Physical examples resonate with your mental chemistry. That chemistry is set up for emotional action in the first place. That action is guided, and developed by, physical examples and experiences.

Higher dimensionality is this process of recognizing advantages to the way we do things, and allowing development to spread, as its guiding knowledge base grows and spreads. The current conditions are never optimal; but on average, over time, the trend of development is a course toward ever-improving potential, on those planets destined to succeed. Such success amounts to better defined, longer, "bigger" contributions to our current 11 dimensional big bang.

When you think you have absolute unconditional freedom, you are essentially trying to claim to be all of the time of the Universe within the confines of your personal time, instead of as the actual course of all time. As that great course, you are truly and completely free... this takes that time, not just yours. You are a product of that time, not just the time you are immediately familiar with. That greater time is within you, and outside of you, as well as before and after you; as the ultimate source of your actions. You are that time, in the long run. In the short run, it is directing your behavior through our rules. You will act it out for all cases of it such as yours, as well as all other types of cases, conscious and unconscious.

Society imposes rules over itself, influencing the emotional make-up of its individuals. This combines with many other physical factors to shape the course of all decision-making.

We are not imposing rules over ourselves simply for the sake of being oppressive. We have gradually learned which rules, applied in which ways, will yield improvements in our survival status, and sense of well being. Within this, however, is another mode of opportunity, that favors selfishness to some extent, for some of us who have gained particular advantages over more of us. To the degree that this functioning operates, there is regular old oppression at work. We don’t always make rules for the overall betterment of society — they sometimes better a few at the expense of the many, when they preclude opportunities for development.

As societies evolve into higher civilization, the optimum degree of oppression decreases. Freedom increases — fewer rules are needed to maintain order in the population.

Our political rules are an indirect extension of our physical rules — the laws of physics that are within and around the behavior of biochemistry. So, too, are our cultural "rules" which are constantly involved with our emotional processes and interactions... our motivations. These rules are not formalized on paper the same way our laws are, but they saturate our media and social interactions. Our society is ongoing anti-entropy. It feeds on energy, to direct it. Like our individual brain-function systems, society is a semi-independent energetic logic progression. It is higher dimensionality stemming out of the lower dimensions of people, which arise out of lower dimensions, down through entropy (whatever it is that we call "entropy").

Knowledge of the rules affects your "judgment" in context to your behavior interacting with your culture. To feel more free, you might choose to use poor judgment, and risk the consequences. This doesn’t release you from fate. This is what your fate is constructed of.

You are only free to choose, if you recognize that it is you within each member of society that contributes to your decisions. You interact with yourself from various times to produce the current higher order time. Individual freedom, limited to one’s self-relative memory is an illusion that sooner and later runs into conflicts. Your true freedom is your collective freedom; available as a recognition of your greater identity as all process. In this, responsibility is your specific job to deal with reality from a basis of self-interactive memory, specific to your immediate conditions, and their history.

We can regard society as a whole to be more free than its component individuals, then. However, society, too, is the product of atomic interactions — a product of the rules that produce and govern atoms — an active sample of these rules. Our culture has succeeded, to its current extent, to recognize its collective responsibilities.

You can obtain the happiness and motivational drive that comes from a sense of freedom, without going overboard and insisting that you, as a single person, have unconditional freedom. One need only take note that reality is full of opportunities. Whatever your position in the mesh, you have a vast array of opportunities, and the world can be a very beautiful place. Sure, most of the opportunities can seem exceedingly mundane and trivial; but their availability provides us with the bulk of our basis of freedom; and there are roses to be seen among the peat moss and thorns, if you recognize the necessary work as opportunities to let them grow. No work is unimportant if you look at it this way. Less important are attitudes that would have you feel unimportant. Sooner or later such modes become self-defeating, giving way to love. In the longest run, love is what makes it all work. It is the ultimate product. It is the source of emergent constructivity. It is the actual physical substance of everything that really matters, as process.

Perhaps most important to a sense of freedom, is the recognition that your opportunities include options to increase or modify your available opportunities; through education for example. To some extent, such a course of action is to partake in being programmed with standardized forms of thinking. To the degree that this makes us all alike, it makes us less free... it works to prevent new and different thought, choice and behavior. Yet, you learn what you learn there, because we have found it useful, and it will provide you with opportunities to be useful in society, in more ways. Moreover, this usefulness produces new thinking, choice and behavior; limited to the options that can be synthesized through association of our component known capacities for problem solving and productivity.

None of this is to say that we can’t instill a sense of self-responsibility — we do this, and we succeed to some extents; and we also fail. In those cases where we fail, we are not recognizing, in time, the ultimate source of responsibility; as a synthesis within individuals of society. This is produced by society as a whole to some extent, but is much more a function of the society immediate to the given individual. Where the process is failing, a greater segment of society must take responsibility, in terms of special steps designed to instill it. It never arises simply out of a void, as our decisions likewise never do. In both cases, we are delayed associative results of interaction, producing more interaction.

We can shrug it off as "bad luck" and let the problems spread and intensify. We can blame the given parents, or the parents of the parents, etc.; considering the problem-ridden life-styles to be deserving of themselves, as particular souls of faulty will power. A more constructive approach is available as an option, that might be more advantageous to us all — to you when you’re "them" of us involved. This approach would recognize the need to break these cycles by intervening in overall positive ways... essentially negative intervention can easily exacerbate the problems to the point of being un-affordable.

At our stage of our development, society is set up to produce the requirement for discipline. There are different kinds of discipline that follow from different attitudes about it, which follow from different examples of "success." Discipline for the sake of discipline, to "build character," is probably anti-productive, overall, in the long run. Understandable reason is probably a stronger, more effective course for organizational happiness. The key is to appreciate who it is who needs to understand what; and how to bring this about. The information must be developed in terms that have meaning to those who require the understanding. Uncaring discipline will work better than reason where the true goal is domination maintenance rather than harmonious prosperity based on shared opportunity. For correction, all self-images are improved.

Discipline that lacks respect will not generate respect. It will generate fear and anger, often in suppressed forms that emerge as latent behavioral attributes.

Collectively, we can take the upper hand in terms of responsibility. We have an opportunity to increase harmony for all, by instilling understanding and providing opportunities, to bring about true correction wherever possible. It is possible wherever we can afford this sensitivity training, and can recognize its overall economic advantage. The sooner we act, the easier the job. The later we act, the more pain is generated. At intermediate levels, prison might be a respectable job, that allows us to pay us for our mistakes, to make us all happier, as much as possible. This might require an exchange of pain, as well as money, in restitution between the respective yous. In the later cases, nothing is going to help. We can only strive to prevent our pain. To do this honestly, we must be alert to our savage desire to produce the opportunity for inflicting punishment, and promoting our sense of domination and superiority. Society provides other means for diffusing these forces peacefully. We better succeed where we accept such needs with respect, and work to improve our methods of dealing with natural drive.

You have freedom; but its the freedom to choose among tenable options, as a delayed response to various pertinent or prominent experiences. You can’t fly like superman; but you can run a red light if you choose. You probably don’t do this, because you predict that sooner or later you’ll get a ticket, or cause a serious accident. Maybe you do intentionally run red lights... in which case you are probably destined to contribute to the construction of our statistics. Your emotional make-up drives your choices, in context with your real options. They will be what they are going to be, because your emotions and the world will produce them. You can choose to protest this by suddenly doing something off-the-wall; but you won’t keep doing that. If you don’t disintegrate, your actions will resume their motivated course; and that act will have been one produced by a desire to be something more than you are, as a response to the given suggestion to react. The act will entail all manner, detail, and multiplicity of enacted physical law, in precisely the form it was going to take; before we knew what it was, in that vague, superficial way that we know all things.

You can think so fast, you’re not aware of the logical "steps" taking place — a step being about 1/1000 th of a second — and the steps intermesh on the level of myriad parallel-acting neurons. These complex steps act in series over time. In the fastest case, various parallel neuron-trains co-evolve and sum over about 1/30 of a second, producing a quick "spontaneous" "free-will" choice. The steps, in themselves, have no meaning; so you don’t gain consciousness at that level of time frame. Consciousness is constructed out of the meaning that is generated over time.

In place of unrealistic unrestricted freedom, we can see ourselves as being perfectly correct. Our actions of striving, of hoping, of succeeding, and of failing are correct ingredients within the perfection of infinite process... the perfection of complete, totally logical reality. In this, part of what makes it perfect is that we can feel free, because we can never feel totally pinned down; since we can never hope, as humans, to fully know or understand our selves or our predicaments. In this perfection, you are free to the extent that you are society and its environment. You are free as an individual insofar as knowing that what you decide to do is the construction of perfection through the completeness of reality.

Besides its completeness, another thing that makes reality perfect is our ultimate equality. Regardless of how out of kilter we manage to get it, we end up being truly equal; because we all turn out to be you, everywhere, everytime, in the Universe.

The most perfect thing, though, is the general association of consciousness with development. This insures that, on average, in the long run, increasing consciousness is associated with increasing order, beauty, peace, opportunity, constructive behavior... all those things we might sum up into the word love. Consciousness itself is association. Our minds are expanding order, and they produce expanding order.

Life is heaven. Heaven turns out to be what we expect it to be, if we succeed in creating that reality. So long as we equate will power with correct domination, there will be conflict that unnecessarily degrades our heaven. We can recognize that our choices always integrate, and use this awareness to produce the order of organization that allows the flow of harmonious reality. This would involve the development of specific avenues of process, wherein individual modes of happiness could excel, with an optimum degree of interacting support, within and between the channels.

We might finally overcome our violent means of establishing superiority, by promoting an understanding of the fundamental nature of consciousness. The best thing for you is the best thing for more people.

We could discover an ability to decide that the best form our will power can take is one of mutual acceptance. Our process can have as its highest goal, the generation of a harmony that develops the best possible overall cooperation on Earth.

Reality has qualities of relative freedom, while it always follows its rules.

You

This hypothesis is a reiteration of the first-stated hypothesis of The Point; from a conscious point of view.

When your distributed self, as defined in your brain, is split in two, there become two of you. The mechanism making this possible is the point. The point is the generation of times for consciousness. Your two yous can now interact between the two times defined as consciousness. The perception of a single time is the valid perception of a synthesis of higher-dimensional overall time out of its component-dimensional times. It is not valid to carry this into an assumption that only one of your two yous is now really you, and the other one is someone else. The other one is you at a different time, that can interact with the one to mesh as an overall definition within complex time. Each you can only experience itself, relative to its expanding memory base, as the definition of its own time. All such times lead through eternity to all such times. You become you. In the meantime, you think your other yous are a whole bunch of someone elses. They are other times of yours; before, after, and beside your current access to memory. Your memory itself has a before and after of experience that is separated from the time that is your now.

When we develop a conscious computer system, we will be able to model this hypothesis into a test. When any given state of awareness is captured in a transferable memory format and taken to another computer, the original system will be able to continue, while a new system, too, will continue. The new system, being identically defined to be inclined in its direction of thought of considerations, will surmise that it has suddenly switched locations in space-time. It will not be surprised that it exists, as a being. It will know itself in the same way as it did in the original location; only the present context of environmental interaction will be different. Different mass is issuing different time of you.

We are all split-off from each other out of eternity. We acquire differing sets of data that engender differing attributes of prioritized motivation. We differ to a far lesser degree than we share common elements of aspiration.

We can regard this as part of the development within dimensionality that is the mathematical definition of reality. Consciousness emerges with development, which means that it increases with goodness. Cases of failure tend to terminate rather than to last on into higher development of greater awareness. In the overall scheme of things, strife is a relatively transient attribute of conscious development, that serves a function within development of driving development out of its more primitive levels. Prior to these geo-physically brief strife-full dealings, development is not yet aware; or is only vaguely aware. In the long run, conscious reality is mostly composed of love. As the overall course of cosmic evolution, this love is the process that is the primary substance of all matter. Its residual effects of existence infer all higher orders of dimensionality, as a basis that makes all realities possible, to the point of its own origin. The love of the Universe has given you your life, among your lives.

The Universe is your soul. There is only one soul, and we all use it, in our "turn." The Universe is aware through us. You are the awareness of the Universe, by the Universe, as limited to the context of your memory. Your present lifetime is infinitely precious onto itself, while it is an infinitely small part of your overall life.

At times, from certain frames of mind, the prospect of "acting out" all people’s lives could seem like a horror movie. Each of us, as we live, has to make choices, and take action. Sometimes you feel that you want to, and sometimes you feel that you have to. When you have to, you usually still want to, indirectly. You have to go to work, because you want money, because you have to eat, because you want food, because you have to get hungry, because you want to live. We all pretty much work the same general way. Overall, it is good. If you let yourself think about it, it is really good. If we all thought about it, it would be super good. It’s up to us. It’s always up to us, on every life-bearing planet.

As we learn to appreciate this arrangement, we gain improved opportunities to advance, through cooperation. This is the shape of evolution in the long run — the nature we must recognize and enjoy to survive. It leans on competition, but grows progressively more cooperative. From the beginning, a balance has been insured by the self-defeating nature of over-competition to eliminate its food source. Evolution has succeeded to produce civilized behavior. Lions and tigers and bears don’t put on symphonies. We are a community of communities. Wouldn’t you like to know what higher civilization does for fun? We find out by allowing our development to take that direction.

The key to our participation in this might be the attainment of a specific level of harmonious cooperation. We on Earth could wait to see if we can figure out how to prove this mathematically on paper; or we might decide that we will better survive by simply being that mathematical reality. Considering our past and recent history, it may seem virtually impossible for us to reach such a consensus. Given enough time as the right qualities of motivation, who knows?

yo youniverse

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII I

t’a I’m 

to I am 

time

[Infinity is not a number. It is the endless supply of numbers... 
the endless supply of reality’s relative processes. 
The infinite "circle" is only possible, relative to consciousness. 
There is infinite time prior to, and following, a train of consciousness. 
Only with the end of consciousness can eternity "pass," around to each 
and every train of consciousness. 
An infinite number of these circles is "split brain reality."]