4. the mathematical universe


A single point touches itself in every possible way. It does so in an infinitely short time, as there is no distance to overcome in any direction. The result is the generation of all relative meaning. From the viewpoint of the interrelating meaning, there is everything but such an imaginary single point.


I think of math as a very grand and fully intricate machine, that we, as humans, may never become completely familiar with. I feel that we think that we have invented math to model and explain various facts of reality, when, actually, we could recognize that the big bang is part of the blossoming of all mathematics logic. Mathematics is a human language that parallels or reflects reality; and then implies many other realities we are often not familiar with, in an everyday sense. Some of these unfamiliar aspects of reality have eventually been found to be actual aspects of some scientific reference frames. Math is a powerful tool.


The source of mathematics is its basis in the fabric of reality, which is composed of logic. Logical reality produces consciousness which is more logical reality. This makes logical process appear to be substance. Logic is relative to logic. Logical consciousness is relative to itself and the world.

Logical process is a developmental communicative interchange of language, which can produce the conscious viewpoint. Our math is part of this language. The development of our math is an attempt to describe it all. If we could be successful, math would be reality. Reality is logic. Logic is language. That language is the same language math is attempting to become. Reality is complete math. Complete math is reality.

A human language cannot fully describe the thing that it is a part of. It can relate coarse aspects or fine details, but it can only be a part of reality. Description cannot be a vehicle with which to completely relate reality to the conscious process. Description must surrender to reality. In making this surrender, you might recognize that reality itself was the language. It cannot be fully described; it is the process of complete description. Only reality is the description that doesn’t leave anything out, that was within its rules. Reality entails all contingencies that its rules support.

The meaning of reality is the process of the development of its language, relative to itself. Developing meaning is a dimensional attribute of reality that rides on the more familiar three or four dimensions. This dimensionality includes such things as the perception, and consequences, of interacting "substance."

The notion that math is reality would be hard to accept if it were taken at a one dimensional level, such as a base of arithmetic. It doesn’t help much to go to a two dimensional variable framework; or even three or four dimensions.


Reality is fully dimensional mathematics.


The Photon Universe


The Photon Universe is the Universe from the point of view of its photons. It is a useful reference frame; though it is virtual. No object or system can travel the speed of light (Vc). The photon itself is a timing event. Objects are systems composed of these events.

The classical laws of motion are subject to corrections, as the motion under consideration significantly approaches Vc. These relativistic corrections contract distance and expand inertial mass, with acceleration of an object having rest mass. Taken to the extreme, infinite energy would be required to bring a system up to Vc. The entire Universe would have to direct its efforts toward this event. If this could be done, the inertial mass of the system would be infinite. If the system going Vc were a clock, and we could still exist at "rest" (Vo), and could still experience time, we would surmise that the clock moving Vc has stopped. From the point of view of the clock, it isn’t that time has stopped; it’s that distance has stopped. It needs no time to get to any point "ahead" of it, and there are no points left behind. It has become all of the points in the direction of its vector.

From our Vo frame, in an infinite Universe, there are an infinite number of photons transpiring in all possible directions. Their courses overlap in time and space, so that no such event is ever isolated. Each discrete event begins while other such events are "in progress." Also, each connection made by the relation of "emitter and receiver" possesses relative position logic that is usually intersected by many other such events during the time spans involved. The result is, that from the reference frame of a photon, you are all of them. When you move from our Vo reference frame to the Vc reference frame, the Photon Universe collapses into a complete and permanent point.

Such a transition is useful for visualizing the relationship between the mathematical point, and the everyday reality it implies. The Photon Universe, however, is virtual. Aspects of it can be useful as tools. The reality of the behavior of "photons" cannot be accounted for if they are treated as objects. They must be seen as rules that are the behavior of the systems they compose.


The reality of the Photon Universe is identical to the reality of the mathematical point. The point does not exist, except in the meaning it gains relative to "other" points in a given pattern of points, that produce a time. Apparent photon behavior depicts the mechanism by which such an individual mathematical point infers all possible realms of realities, as though existing within that single point, through the process of relating that point to itself. That process expands the point into apparent full dimensionality, relative to the conscious process it also infers.


The Logical Universe


To say that the Universe is logical is to say that it is composed of rules that bring order, repetition, and reliability to the interaction of systems that, in turn, are composed of such rules. The rules are self-sustaining. They have costs, but they produce great beauty.

Logic is the true substance of reality. It is the acting existence of the rules that govern themselves. These rules relate to themselves, here, in such a way as to produce the conscious viewpoint of the overall process.

From the conscious viewpoint, logic is temporal. Static logic is an active idea, representing, for example, some math set down on paper. This logic is not really static either. When it is being thought about, it is participating in time, in a system involving a brain. Even when it is not being thought about, it is an active collection of atomic processes in time. The paper and ink are not static — they are part of the ongoing process of atomic reality. The logical ideas, generated by the patterns, are never static; they are always mental process. We can remember that they are sitting there, after we’ve finished looking at them; but memory, too, is more of the same mental process. The paper and ink continue to run their program too, after you close the book. Any factors of constancy are produced and supported by active systems, relative to other active systems. The static part is only a mental concept we humans lean on in our effort to dissect and simplify reality down to sub-dimensional components that are easier to accept. (Fundamentally, this may come partly from our fear of death... on the one hand, we want eternal rest; on the other hand, we fear eternal emptiness... we think, in the back of our minds, that we might avoid nothingness by arming ourselves with the concept of permanence instilled in a reality all composed of hard static stuff. We needn’t fear nothingness — you can do that forever, painlessly. Nothingness cannot perceive. Process perceives. Process is all there really is. There is no question whether you can do this. You will. You have. You are it. It is impossible for you to be a time that is nothingness, because nothingness cannot be any sort of time. Only process is times.)

There is one reference frame that has a static character. It is the source of all logic. To see it, you must step away from the everyday conscious frame. It is beyond humanity, beyond the mode of being a creature; and even well beyond our big bang. Here you recognize that our logic is a related set of rules that essentially form a tree. This tree is not limited to a single big bang. Beyond this, there can be other trees with other "things" going on that our consciousness is not capable of dealing with, since its made of different rules. That is to say, the trees are isolated, since, by definition, a tree is composed of related logic. If you imagine all such trees as being a part of the sum of all logic; and superimpose each one’s eternities into a single concept, you can treat logic as the unavoidable consequence of the relationships a point has to itself. This can be thought of as being static, in that it goes beyond time — beyond all variety of all infinitely repeating eternities. It simply is everything... everything as process collapsed into the point. All processes are inferred by the point. All processes will appear as processes in time, relative to conscious viewpoint processes. To the point, all simply is. To us, all is generated by the point. The point itself is unavoidable because it is nothing and everything simultaneously.

I believe that the point actually shows itself as singularity phenomena. Our world is bipolar process, generated by the point. We see this as process composed of balanced opposites, pivoting on the point. The viewpoint of the point would see all time condensed into a fixed sum of all process.


From our current point of view, there was a big bang that has generated, among other things, a scattering field of black holes.


Universal Systemology


The title of this section seems like a good label for the concept that has driven my life to produce this book. It is meant to imply that reality has systematic features, and that system formats are generally standardized. For example, reality is primarily a hydrogen system. Hydrogen gas fills the space between the galaxies and stars; and fuels the processes that are the stars. The process of being a star is a systematic one, that goes on in a very similar manner as many other stars. The process of being hydrogen is a systematic one, that goes on in a nearly identical way, as all hydrogen. Being a galaxy, a solar system, an ecosystem, or an organism, is being a system among fellow systems with very similar characteristics, at your level of systemology.

The systematic characteristics of reality are viewed, under this term, as running at a right angle to entropy. The organizational qualities of reality compose the next dimensions beyond those exerting influences we call entropy. Entropy is an ingredient within overall order.

The term labels a fundamental concept, original to the author in 1957, that there need be no limit to the levels of systemology. There could be an infinite number of big bangs going on "along side" ours. At some minute level of reality, little "big bangs" could be going on within matter, at a tremendous rate, and in very great number. Our group of big bangs might likewise compose a very much bigger and slower one; which, in turn, has neighbors that compose a yet bigger one... and so on, without limit.


We have been comfortable limiting the extremes of reality. We have avoided looking beyond a finite span of time for our big bang, for example; sighting that it simply doesn’t matter, or make sense, to consider time before there was any. From this perspective, one can gain a sense of security from the prospect that death most likely will bring permanent rest.


Universal Systemology gives in to the notion that, on the contrary, you may have to do everything. It assumes that it doesn’t make any more sense to assume a finite Universe than it does to assume an infinite one. It assumes that we should consider the alternatives as we work to find the answers to those stubborn questions imposed on us by our condition.




Reality is dimensional. In the everyday sense, we think of it as being three dimensional. We deal with objects that have height, width and depth. Sometimes we think of everyday reality as being four dimensional, where time is the fourth dimension... it allows the three dimensional objects to be moved around. They move as time goes on. Without time, reality would be static. Everything would be permanently affixed to a three dimensional framework.


The dimensions of reality are not independent. This is to say that, when we speak of the "second dimension," we are referring to an abstract simplification of reality. We must work, in our imagination, at a two dimensional level, in order to analyze and solve problems. In describing reality itself, however, it becomes necessary to point out that this view has no basis in the substance that is actual process. A piece of paper, for example, has some thickness. Atoms have a thickness of influence. A two dimensional plane is purely imaginary. Reality includes the 2nd dimension as an attribute; but that attribute is inseparable from the living scheme of dimensionality.


Let us now build a picture of dimensionality, so as to begin our approach toward a picture of reality. We may as well start with the 0th dimension.


The 0th dimension has no dimensions. It is useful as a starting point for building dimensionality. To go from the 0th dimension to the 1st dimension, we will bring in another point, or move the first one to another position, or trade one position for another; remembering that either position is possible. To have one point is to allow more points... the first one is essentially nothing, so it doesn’t matter how many you have; you still have nothing. To move the point smoothly in a constant direction, however, is to begin the process of creating substance from nothing. In moving a point any distance, you imply the existence of a relative set of points, infinite in number, having an origin, and a destination. You set up a trend that is essentially a definition of fundamental process. The process attains the substance of a line, relative to the logical non-substance of our original nothing. We have altered the balance of our starting definition, by allowing the orderly creation of an infinite number of points. The creation of a trend that produces an infinite amount of nothing, in an orderly progression, gives our original point the inferred meaning of a one dimensional vector. To move the point from one position to another one, relative to the first one, is to raise its status to a new level of definition. It is no longer a point of nothing. It is a process. By creating this process, we have cheated. We have begun to make something, but we have begun by making it from nothing. This imbalance in our starting effort can be easily remedied. We only allow the creation of our one dimensional vector, if we require that it occur simultaneously with the creation of an exactly identical, but relatively negative, vector. Now we have created nothing from nothing... from the point of view of the origin. We have also created a pair of symmetrical reference frames, that consider themselves to be relatively substantial.

The process of building dimensionality will make use of right angles. This rule is effortless when developing the 1st dimension from the 0th. Any direction we choose for our symmetrical vectors will be perpendicular to the origin. The process is complete when we allow the vectors to reach infinitely in both directions. To this end, we will borrow a little knowledge from our conditions. I promise to pay it back, later in the discussion. We will give each vector a length of Vc. The symmetrical vectors have this attribute of velocity, and we will give them eternity to transpire. Since the line we trace is now infinitely long, any point on it can be used for an origin. Any point will be at the "center" of the line. To say that any point can be utilized as the origin, is to say that they infer a connected-ness to each other; a convertible identity. In the infinite case, we can consider the line that we have created to be equivalent to an infinite circle. A line is parallel to a circle, when the line and circle are truly infinite. They need only lie on the same plane. The unlimited vector reaches completely around to itself. A finite vector can also reach to "itself," from any point, to any point, on the infinite line, so long as another vector of identical length simultaneously does so, in the opposite direction, from any other point on the line, to the necessary destination. The net motion in our system is equivalent to our starting definition... it is equivalent to simply allowing the existence of a single point.

All of the above cases involve an infinite number of points. We can view these examples in greater detail by considering them to be a series of successive point definitions, relative to an origin point. We can only maintain this relative origin reference, if we restrict ourselves to symmetrical cases. The symmetry of opposing point definition progressions, infers the existence of their origin, by maintaining equality of its relative position.

The distance between the points of our departing vectors, at any instant, also has no meaningful definition when there is only one pair of vectors. They can infer the existence of an origin midway between, but if, in their view, only the other vector exists, and not the origin, then there is no reference with respect to the distance of their separation. The process still falls short of inferring any meaning beyond the simple existence of two points. To attain the meaning of distance, we must allow at least one other pair of opposing vectors to be available, in the view of the vectors. Now we have a system with which to gauge relative distance. This also happens to be the number of primary elements to Object Physics, and DNA.

We can visualize the points, yet recognize that any given point is tentative. At any relative position, a point could be added or removed from membership in the sequence. The points themselves are nothing, since they have no dimensions. They are a given, and they can be taken. It is of no consequence how we attempt to alter their infinite sequence, so long as we do so symmetrically. Unless we remove a given line completely, it will always have an infinite number of points; and they will all be tentative.

From this view, we can now visualize the propagation of light, along a line, as the timing between the definition, and re-definition, of the relative position of which point is there, and which new point is now there instead. Any number of simultaneous progressions of point position definition can be tolerated, without departing from the net motion of a single point, so long as they are accompanied by equal and opposite progressions.

Such a reality would be one dimensional. Given eternity, all random progression combinations would occur. Our line would be fully defined.

The existence of the complement brings an element of order to the fundamental structure of permitted random motion. The order is as much a given as the point. It is implied as a requirement by nothing, where nothing is allowed to freely produce random motion. The element of order is carried throughout dimensionality, and is essential to structured systems that proceed consciously. The random remainder is an essentially ignored ground beneath structure, who’s significance may hold meaning relative to other realities.

To view the line as an infinite circle, being traced at Vc for eternity, is to allow the Vc viewpoint to reach completely around to itself. Two opposing vectors of this mechanism are inferred by each point on our line. This sub-reality is a restricted view that serves as the starting point for the generation of our 2nd dimension. The process is repeated, beginning this time with a line instead of a point.

We can choose any point on our line, and define another line running through that point, at an infinitely small angle. To maintain our balance, with respect to our original line, we can simultaneously define a complementary line, through the same intersected origin point, at the reverse angle. Now when we increase the angles to 90 degrees, we will fully define an infinite plane. The plane is now equivalent to an infinite sphere. Any point in the plane can be considered an origin. Any pair or groups of equivalent, but opposing vectors will still have a net motion equivalent to a point.

In a similar fashion, an origin plane is intersected at a common line by complementary planes, and carried at Vc to perpendicularity with the origin plane, to define three dimensions. Now we have an infinite volume, or solid sphere of infinite diameter. Vectors are radiated in all directions at Vc. All of these vectors originate from a given origin, in bi-directional volumetric arcs, that return them to their origin. Unlike the two previous examples, however, we must consider these negative returns as coming from beyond our view.

At one dimension we could say that opposing vectors depart from an origin; and return, heading toward the origin from opposite directions. At two dimensions, we can have diverging groups return from opposite directions, in a convergence back to the origin. In three dimensions we must recognize that we have been referring to negative dimensionality, when we reversed the orientation of our vectors back to the origin. We do not have to accept negative volume. We can regard the process as a return that converges in inside-out relative form.

Any point in the solid can be considered as our original point. All relative sequential point definition combinations are permitted, in complementary form. Note that there are three axes of perpendicular Vc. The dimensionality of our solid consists of c•c•c; or c3.

Lets state this by saying


D3 = c3

... the 3rd dimension is c cubed.


We can say that photons define our three dimensions; and do so in two basic ways. Each photon has a constituency of three Vc factors, at right angles to each other... the electrostatic lines, the magnetic lines, and the direction of "travel" for the photon, that relates a source system to a destination system with a timing delay between balanced energy transitions. Our three dimensions are also defined by the variety of directions with which these timing delays occur.

Reality has more than three dimensions. This discussion continues the thoughts began in the last chapter. Our world consists of three dimensional things, in a three dimensional framework. For their relationship to change, we must introduce relative motion. Uniform motion of objects, relative to other objects, is the fourth dimension. The extreme limit for this is the case where all motion in the infinite volume is channeled into the motion of a single object. This is the case we keep borrowing from reality, where the uniform velocity defining that dimension is Vc.

Vc can be regarded as the case where the motion of an object becomes fully perpendicular to its three dimensional framework, regardless of the direction of that motion. The "regardless" here is reminiscent of its place where we started, when building a line from a point. This is one of many hints, in reality, that there is a special significance, or cyclical quality, about the number of dimensions that define a static solid.

When using a complementary pair of lines to develop the definition of a plane, a line most defines the plane when it is rotated fully perpendicular to its origin line. Likewise, the plane fully defines the solid when perpendicular to the origin plane.

As an object’s velocity approaches Vc, its internal clock rate slows, and would stop if the velocity became Vc. All of the external objects would be stationary, could they exist. They would all forfeit all of their energy. The object at Vc becomes the time. It fully defines the time; but cannot be an object, because its own internal timer must be stopped. The object perceives its source and destination to be present simultaneously — to be a point. The points are relativistically connected. One "object" at Vc would fully define the 4th dimension. All of the objects must share this resource.

The "pay-back" that I owed you is constantly developing all around you, and within you. I used Vc to develop the lower dimensions fully, rotating a given vector to a perpendicular that defined the next vector. When uniform motion becomes the basic vector, taking it to "perpendicularity" yields Vc. Now we may be justified in using Vc as the common ingredient of all dimensions. It is the fundamental quantization of reality into interwoven infinite "pieces" of reality. This will be further developed.


D4 = c4


Energy can be thought of as time of time. For there to be motion, is for there to be time. For there to be change in motion, there must be times of differing motion; there must be times of times.


D5 = c5


Now we can draw our attention to an interesting parallel. In General Relativity, mass is regarded as a geometrical property of reality. Without having familiarity with the details of this, Object Physics also produces a view of geometry, who’s natural definition includes all gravitational features. Though it ends up attributing an element of time to all dimensions, it too considers mass to be three dimensional insofar as it is able to restrict its view of anything to such low numbers. I suspect that these dimensional statements parallel all of our physical expressions.


D3 = m D5 = m•c•c E = mc2


We might fear that such a Universe would be totally random, and void of any control. This would probably be true. Reality has a great deal of order. It produces galaxies and solar systems, as well as life-supporting environments, and conscious systems, that deal with that order. For there to be order, there must be patterns to our energy. For energy to be patterned, it must be modified; just as time must be modified to produce energy. Order is time of energy. Order is the fundamental dimensional realm of consciousness. Consciousness is the relative meaning that exists within active order, as supported by a structured frame of memory.


D6 = Um

... the 6th dimension is the Universe with meaning.


These six dimensions are still not enough to fully describe reality, nor do they fully support the generation of our experiential reality from the point. At the level of six dimensional process, we recognize the attribute of meaning that becomes available when energy exists in patterns. We have the basis for order, but we don’t really have the kind of order we must explain. One could say that it is simply a matter of time before such order will well up out of the random/symmetrical basis. One might also recognize that these factors of time are, yet again, factors of time that fill out the dimensionality of reality, relative to the consciousness that does proceed within its framework.

Our simple trend here, of adding dimensions by factoring in Vc, is carried to completion in Object Physics, by removing the limit. This defines objects within the framework of Universal Systemology. This trend is presented here in a form that is sensitive to the fundamental significance of three dimensions. The first three dimensions have been developed as a geometrical basis for reality, and the next three have been generated as factors of time in that three dimensional basis. We are about to review dimensions 4 through 6 from a slightly different angle, to note their special significance, relative to the conscious reference frame. Before we attribute the rest of reality to infinite dimensionality, we should consider an additional triad of dimensions, as attachments to our trilogy of time dimensions.

One more fundamental concept is needed to explain our condition... memory. The 7th through 9th dimensions can be considered as factors of time over the basis of time, that bring full order to our world, in the form of a rule tree. Not only do six dimensional patterns exist; they exist in sequences that relate to other sequences in ways that we perceive of in nature, as nature. We have rules. We are rules. We only exist because of them. We exist relative to them. The rules govern sub-systems of rules. They support all of the reference frames of reality, including the major ones we are considering here.

In describing the generation of a rule tree from the point, in nine dimensions of memory, time and space; we find that our loose ends, in this big picture, get wrapped around it. We borrowed Vc from our experience to develop the picture, almost at the start. Its status as a speed limit, that defines time, becomes prominent at the 4th dimension. How did we get a speed limit? And how can an orderly rule tree develop out of a fundamental random/symmetrical basis? These two questions answer each other. There isn’t really a speed limit, relative to the point. The development of relationships between the point and itself, takes place at an infinite rate, over those infinite arcs we developed. The relationships between these arcs are perceived within a nine dimensional framework as having finite qualities of time and space. The rule tree is possible because of memory. Memory is the repetition of time. The heartbeat of the point is actually infinitely fast; since any rate would be so, relative to no other rates. This generates relationships, between the infinite number of eternities it generates. We are inferred by this, and view the relationships as being based on the reference Vc. It’s the connection of eternities, defining a reality that produces consciousness, perceiving relative finitudes.

Our three dimensions of memory correspond to three categories of qualities of reality, generated as our rule tree.

Time is an attribute of reality, governing three dimensional frames, to support uniform motion. Memory is an attribute of that four dimensional frame, that essentially makes that motion real, by making the object that is moving real; by remembering it from one instant to the next. The fundamental source of the object is its symmetrical random basis. That this will be repeated, sustains it. That it can be sustained, brings it one step closer to participating in our orderly reality, relative to the conscious systems that too, are remembered.

The next step is to control the timing of the fundamental repetition, so as to remember the trends of changing relationships between objects, as their motion defines the re-distribution of energy. This dimension does not have to magically grab ‘a hold of the random remembered basis, and shake it into orderly submission. It would be more realistic to say that it is the possibility that these relationships can be formed between the random elements. That a rule tree supports smooth transitions of energy, is to say that we can be patient. We can wait another infinite number of cycles if necessary (for an essentially infinitely short time), as many times again as necessary (still an inconsequential pause, on the average), until the correct object is where it belongs; to define our point in that next level of dimensionality. Time develops the higher dimensions. It develops all the rule trees. The developments are viewed by the rule trees as belonging where they belong. The dimensions don’t make time behave right. Time builds the dimensions.

We can ignore all the errors that will be generated around our desired eight dimensional point, thanks to the 9th dimension. Here we remember relative meaning. A nine dimensional object is simply the available viewpoint that ignores all of the irrelevant random process, by consisting of memory-based process that is organized by association of relative meaning.

Memory changes the six dimensional frame, that supports elements of meaning, into a nine dimensional frame. This brings unity to an individual’s dispersed systems of consciousness, by defining them as a nine dimensional object in reality. This Consciousness hypothesis is an offshoot of the Object Physics hypothesis, and visa-versa. Much of this thought originated out of split brain considerations. That issue forced the consideration of higher orders of time. Object Physics then recognized a physical basis for multiple orders of time in dimensionality, as the framework of Universal Systemology.

The dimensions beyond environmental patterns of energy involve mentality... the repetitive representation of the lower dimensions (memory), their repetitive associative variations, associative interaction between the associating representations and the represented dimensionality; different conscious life spans, society (repetitive and associative memory as culture and progress), and the bang as a collection of all bangs. These higher dimensions will be dealt with in more detail in chapter 10, after developing a view of mental process in chapter 8.


It is the finities that are an illusion, not infinity. Everything is infinitely far away from each other. Everything is infinitely big. All process has an infinitely fast basis. And all of this exists as an infinitely small point. Finite qualities are only apparent, relative to each other. Photons connect eternities. These relationships induce apparent finite qualities.


Linear Time


Linear time is partially a fallacy. It is the concept that all processes of reality are co-existing, and moving together, forward in time. This is only the way it looks. Or, at least, that’s the way it looks, until you seriously consider the implications of split brain experience.

Linear time is a truth, insofar as it is an attribute, or real component, of a larger reality. Its apparent pervasiveness is a result of its true pervasiveness as a perceivable quality of reality. The complete, complex nature of time is its endless multiplicity. A nine dimensional object proceeds fundamentally in linear time. Its memory unifies its processes into an object that perceives itself, and the world, as a function of common time.

Linear time is the attribute of time, contributed to linear reality by the fourth dimension.


Planar Time


Planar time is, again, an attribute of reality that does not completely define time. It would appear that we humans have left it largely unconsidered. To the extent that this is true for You, You will find the logic foreign, difficult to accept, and perhaps distasteful or crazy. It is, however, the step you need to take, in order to reconcile split brain experience with the rules of reality.

Simply put, planar time is the organization of linear time into a plane. Sounds logical, and easy enough; but what does this mean? It means that the linear quality of time wraps around, through eternity, to come around and be "beside itself," and with itself, in great multiplicity. A sequence of points in time, has a past and future trail so great that it can relate to itself in eternal cycles. These are the infinite arcs, traversed at infinite speed. An infinite number of them exist. They are different infinite sections of a common infinite "line" of time. These lines relate to each other in offsets that appear as relationships of time and space, based on Vc. Your other Yous really are your other Yous.


Solid Time


To complete our appreciation of time, we must recognize that the fundamental structure of our system imposes no constraints on the size of sub-systems that will compose it. We can adhere to Vc as a reference through all this, but we must recognize that our rule tree will include all of the "pieces" of reality it is composed of.

Planar time is a description of linear time relating to itself at a common level. Solid time depicts systems as being related to sub-systems, by virtue of being composed of those sub-systems. It is the fundamental definition of time in the structure of Universal Systemology. That there can be a given system, is acknowledgment that the same system will exist at faster and slower relative rates; due to the fixed Vc acting over shorter and longer distances. Our rule tree is constructed of multiple versions of reality, that appear to us in the form of quantities of solid time, that we call atoms and particles. We are in such a particle. All such particles consist of an endless progression of finer levels of identical systemology. These relationships are a primary aspect of the full dimensionality of mathematics that is reality.




Now that you’re in heaven, what do you think? It could be that you enter heaven by understanding that You are here. It gives you all of the challenges, all of the risks, and all of the pain and joy that are possible within a highly structured framework, that develops and supports awareness.

Of course, it would be nice to succeed. It seems probable, that regardless of what has been said here, an understanding of ourselves and reality is a requirement for our long-term survival. Along the same lines, we can imagine that that understanding will also promote our welfare and capacity to enjoy life.

What is being said by the philosophy outlined here, is that you will succeed, but you will do so because you are also certain to fail. This can sound horrible or beautiful, depending on your frame of mind, and your experiences. This affects your capacity to appreciate the various facets of reality, and their relationships; such as the people it produces. To some extent or another, it should be comforting to recognize that the system we see here will favor enjoyment by rewarding success with longevity, on the average. All those planets of yours that are doomed to early failure are mostly ones that destroy themselves out of a lack of self appreciation and understanding. These modes of behavior and awareness are primitive and dilute by comparison to modes that we cannot begin to imagine; where your development has continued for billions of years, in acceleration, beyond our levels. Even if there are millions of planetary failures for each success, we can imagine that the enjoyment attained, by such ultimate consciousness, far outweighs its developmental costs.



[Infinity is not a number. It is the endless supply of numbers... 
the endless supply of reality’s relative processes. 
The infinite "circle" is only possible, relative to consciousness. 
There is infinite time prior to, and following, a train of consciousness. 
Only with the end of consciousness can eternity "pass," around to each 
and every train of consciousness. 
An infinite number of these circles is "split brain reality."]